ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1291|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

不明白解释。。。

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-2-6 15:44:40 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
13.    A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.
(A) that they will, or could,
(B) that they would, or could,
(C) they will be or could    
(D) think that they will be or could
(E) think the power stations would or could
In choice E, “would” is faulty because it suggests without warrant that the stations would be made safe if some unnamed conditions were met. 为什么??????什么意思
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-2-6 15:56:53 | 只看该作者
用would的话就会产生conditional的效果,就是说核电站在满足某种条件conditions下才会安全。然而原句是没有这个意味。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 17:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部