ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 12611|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12-61求助

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-1-26 16:36:30 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
61. Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of the Maya as an achievement, the army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China
's first emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete.


A.  the army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China
's first emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete.


B. Qin Shi Huang, China
's first emperor, was protected in his afterlife by an army of terra-cotta warriors that was created more than 2,000 years ago by 700,000 artisans who took more than 36 years to complete it.


C. it took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to create an army of terra-cotta warriors more than 2,000 years ago that would protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife.

D. more than  2,000 years ago, 700,000 artisans worked more than 36years to create an army of terra-cotta warriors to protect Qin Shi Huang, China
's first emperor, in his afterlife


E. more than  36 years were needed to complete the army of terra-cotta warriors that 700,000 artisans created 2,000 years ago to protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife

我选D,答案是A.我觉得D表达更主动些比A,而且语意也是合理的,为什么不对?谢谢大牛们
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
13#
发表于 2016-5-2 16:45:28 | 只看该作者
yokohama 发表于 2015-7-17 17:06
知道rivaling意思后,我明白应该选{army}作主语。但是A中两两个谓语动词 is and took,时态可以不一致, ...

啊,我也在考虑楼上这个问题啊,抱歉挖坟了!!
warriors took sb sometime to complete,为什么我总觉得这个句子不完整啊

It took me 10 minutes to eat the cake难道可以改写成
the cake took me 10 minutes to eat
不知道有没有NN能解答?
12#
发表于 2015-7-17 17:06:46 | 只看该作者
知道rivaling意思后,我明白应该选{army}作主语。但是A中两两个谓语动词 is and took,时态可以不一致,我也是懂的。但是--“army took 人/时间 to complete 自己?”--,我想问一下不用考虑被动吗? 难道不是{工匠花了好几年去完成army吗?}所以应该=army是工匠花了好几年完成的?
11#
发表于 2012-3-28 09:18:58 | 只看该作者
我觉得这里没有省略is
is more than 2000 years old and took 7000....是并列的
前者现在时表示陈述一种状态,一个事实,后者一般过去表示过去发生的事情



这种说法是对的~
10#
发表于 2010-9-24 04:41:35 | 只看该作者
took 这里是不是省略了 is????
应该是和 is more than 2,000 yrs old 并列的
-- by 会员 安静的小兔 (2010/9/23 10:08:24)


我觉得这里没有省略is
is more than 2000 years old and took 7000....是并列的
前者现在时表示陈述一种状态,一个事实,后者一般过去表示过去发生的事情
9#
发表于 2010-9-23 10:08:24 | 只看该作者
took 这里是不是省略了 is????
应该是和 is more than 2,000 yrs old 并列的
8#
发表于 2010-8-25 20:37:21 | 只看该作者
Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of the Maya as an achievement, the army of terra-cotta warriors

created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China’s fi rst emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000 artisans

more than 36 years to complete.

这里的and took是和谁并列啊?took在这里是不是谓语动词啊?

我觉得took的主语好像是the army of terra-cotta warriors ,但是is 也是系动词做谓语啊~那两个不一样时态的谓语可以并列??
7#
发表于 2010-7-23 08:56:46 | 只看该作者
谓语动词是is,created后面那一串是用来形容兵马俑的,迷惑人的,
6#
发表于 2010-7-23 08:36:16 | 只看该作者
答案是A

但是我覺得A根本少個動詞啊 the army of terra-cotta worriors was created to protect

不是應該要用被動嗎?
5#
发表于 2010-3-4 23:05:52 | 只看该作者
Rivaling媲美的意思,其实通过后面也可看出,逻辑主语题
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-29 03:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部