ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Although ice particles in the upper atmosphere benefit Earth in that they reflect and absorb solar radiation, acting as a global thermostat and thus keeping Earth from either burning up or freezing over, they also accelerate the destruction of the ozone layer by reacting with chlorofluorocarbons (CFC's).

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 7123|回复: 17
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于prep 2--43 分词修饰的疑惑

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-1-17 10:39:44 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
Although ice particles in the upper atmosphere benefit Earth in that they reflect and absorb solar radiation, acting as a global thermostat and thus keeping Earth from either burning up or freezing over, they also accelerate the destruction of the ozone layer by reacting with chlorofluorocarbons (CFC's).
A. acting as a global thermostat and thus keeping Earth from either burning up or freezing over, they also accelerate
B. acting as a global thermostat and thus keeping Earth either from burning up or freezing over, while also accelerating
C. act as a global thermostat and thus keep Earth from either burning up or freezing over, while also accelerating
D. they act as a global thermostat that thus keeps Earth either from burning up or freezing over, even though it also accelerates
E. they act as a global thermostat to thus keep Earth from either burning up or freezing over, but they also accelerate
答案选择A 这个没有疑惑

可是对acting as a global thermostat and thus keeping Earth from either burning up or freezing over

作用有疑惑  按照题目含义理解 应该是作为状语成分 修饰前句they reflect and absorb solar radiation

但是也可以作为定语修饰solar radiation

如果这样,应该会产生修饰歧义

help

收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
18#
发表于 2011-6-24 18:12:08 | 只看该作者
tibet提供的链接
17#
发表于 2010-10-28 10:43:53 | 只看该作者
多谢tibet!!
16#
发表于 2010-10-15 12:33:04 | 只看该作者
这里绝对不是做定语修饰solar radiation的哈,
那个现在分词无论在句前或者在句后(如果用“,”与前面的名词,这里是“solar radiation”分隔开了的话),逻辑主语是主句主语,即the ice particles, 表示动作伴随或者定语修饰ice particles
15#
发表于 2010-6-11 21:44:34 | 只看该作者
我觉得essentail就是看他的内容是不是影响句子的主要意思,因为由两个逗号隔开的成分,应该可以从句子中拿去而不影响整体要表达的意思。
OG解释中有很多次提到这个,你可以去翻翻
-- by 会员 keith139 (2010/6/11 21:16:56)


谢谢楼上,不过我的意思是在不知道该不该有逗号的前提下,如何判断这个句子的essential的程度,比如上面的例子:
Note that if the participial phrase is essential to the meaning of the sentence, no commas should be used:

The student earning the highest grade point average will receive a special award.
The guy wearing the chicken costume is my cousin.
如果在红色的字前后加逗号,
The student, earning the highest grade point average ,will receive a special award.
The guy ,wearing the chicken costume, is my cousin.
也通顺的呀
不知道是不是钻牛角尖了。。努力翻OG中....
14#
发表于 2010-6-11 21:16:56 | 只看该作者
我觉得essentail就是看他的内容是不是影响句子的主要意思,因为由两个逗号隔开的成分,应该可以从句子中拿去而不影响整体要表达的意思。
OG解释中有很多次提到这个,你可以去翻翻
13#
发表于 2010-6-10 14:53:50 | 只看该作者
顶!!
不过我还有个疑问,判断 if the participial phrase is essential ,这个essential的标准是什么?是指分词结构对主语有很强的限制性吗?是指缺少了这个分词短语则句子的主语就会过于宽泛吗?
盼NN解答
12#
发表于 2010-2-21 17:13:24 | 只看该作者
非常清楚!!太感谢了~
依此原则,此题中,分词堕尾且用逗号隔开,就不能应用就近原则来修饰JC,而是修饰句中主语。修饰主语明显错误,所以此选项排除。
11#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-17 19:31:47 | 只看该作者
再次感谢啊  本身我还想把PREP这些题目都找出来自己慢慢想想的
省了很多时间啊!
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-17 19:24:37 | 只看该作者
非常感谢啊~!
呵呵 解决了偶困惑很久的东东
太棒了~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 08:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部