关于并列结构和限制性定于从句的SC题

victoria620

P174.4 It appears illogical to some people that West Germany which bans shuch seeming lesser evils as lawn-moving on Sundays, still has some 4000 miles of highway with not speed limit.

B which bans such seemingly lesser evils as

Which 代非限制性定语从句不应该是, which 吗？此处为何用作非限制性定语从句的指代？？



P177.13 Studies show that young people with higher-than-average blood pressure and their families have a history of high blood pressure are more likely than others to develop a severe form of the condition.

B. Whoes families have a history of high blood pressure

C.and a history of high blood pressure runs in the family

我同意答案选b但是

c 中 young people with higher-than-average blood pressure and a history of high blood pressure runs in the family  and 的并列结构如果从with 后面理解也是说得通的啊

P170.14 The suspect in the burglary was advised of his right to remain silent, told he could not leave, and was iterrogated in a detention room.  

B.of his right ro remain silent, told he could not leave, and

C. of his right to remain silent and that he could not leave and

D. that he had a righ to remain silent, could not leave, and was

E. that he had a fight to remain silent, that he could not leave, and was

答案是B 我明白。但是为什么and 前面加“,”不是应该 was  advised of, told…and iterrogated吗？ 例如 a , b and c 加“,”后面的句子结构就不完整了呀。

pansean

P174.4中个人觉得，如果要表明主句意思的It appears illogical to some people，which后的成分更像是限定性成分。。。即对句子意思起重要作用的成分。。并与后面has some 4000 miles XXX构成illogical的表现

P177.13 姑且不论blood pressure and a history用谓语runs来搭配有否错，假如两个选项从grammer和meaning考虑都合理，就要从concision角度来排除选项

P170.14 B中3个谓宾的并列，如果后面不加逗号，似乎更象是单纯后2个谓宾的并列

个人愚见。。请NN更正

zxj869895664

第一题我也很困惑 谁能解释下呢？