ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3687|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请大家看看这一道题,我不是很确定哪个更合适?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-11-13 19:47:40 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式

Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less, get better gas mileage, allow passengers to get in and out more easily, and have a smoother ride.

A.      Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,

B.       Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, they cost less,

C.      Minivans carry as many as seven passengers, in comparison with most sport utility vehicles, and have a lower cost, they  

D.      Minivans, carrying as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,

E.       Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles the cost is lower, and they

Could any one be kind to analyse this problem?I'm a little bit confused by the answer A and D
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
13#
发表于 2010-3-13 07:22:10 | 只看该作者
同意楼上,究竟和谁并列还得看意思,不能感觉,对吧。
12#
发表于 2010-3-12 12:09:37 | 只看该作者
鄙人浅见。

原文中逻辑意思carry一动作并不应该被包括在compare的对象之内。

以D选项为例,M车,载7人,比较于大多数的S车...

我们可以读出这句子的确存在歧义。“载七人”并不与后面cost等等一系列动作形成比较。

不当之处,恳请指正。
11#
发表于 2009-11-15 14:50:22 | 只看该作者
D是不是就是所谓夹心饼干 既可以修饰前面主语 又可以修饰后面的话 于是乎。。。
10#
发表于 2009-11-15 10:59:52 | 只看该作者
我的思路楼主看对不对啊~
对于A来说
Minivans 主语
carry as many as seven passengers 修饰主语,说明minivans的特性(这里不能和sport vehicles比,赛车能坐7个人?)
and,这里很多人说不必要and,但是and实际上是为了引出后面的第二层次意思——开始对比
compared with most sport utility vehicles, 不能删掉,也不能提前(楼上说的分词结构提前不能适用)因为要引出下面的对比。
(Minivans)cost less, get better gas mileage, allow passengers to get in and out more easily, and have a smoother ride. 一个完美的平行结构。
对于D来说:
Minivans, carrying as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less, get better gas mileage, allow passengers to get in and out more easily, and have a smoother ride.
大问题是,compared到底修饰谁?我觉得修饰passengers也可以啊,和原句意思不符。是错的原因
9#
发表于 2009-11-15 03:26:32 | 只看该作者
根据OG对修饰有效性的定义:修饰名词的成分必须合理有效地分布在被修饰对象前后。
根据prep笔记,修饰名词比较有效的结构是:分词结构,名词,修饰成分1,修饰成分2。。。。
这就是D错误的原因,不知道对不对。
8#
发表于 2009-11-14 12:42:03 | 只看该作者
仔细看了下 好像是A比较好。。。
7#
发表于 2009-11-14 12:41:08 | 只看该作者
?    GWD-24-38
?    In January 1994 an oil barge ran aground off the coast of San Juan, Puerto Rico, leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of the city’s beaches.

A.    leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of
B.    with its cargo of 750000 gallons leaking into the ocean, and it polluted
C.    and its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, polluting
D.    while it leaked its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean and caused the pollution of
E.    so that its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, and they were polluting.
C
不过这道也是因为逻辑意思所以重心转移的
A答案哪来的啊
6#
发表于 2009-11-14 12:39:54 | 只看该作者
我也觉得逻辑上选D比较好
不过D重心转移了
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-11-14 10:18:11 | 只看该作者
事实上这个答案是A,有人说这个题目的风格在OG里面是很常见的啊。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-22 22:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部