求助 新prep2 217.(GWD-8-Q11)，汇总没有！~

linza

217. (31117-!-item-!-188;#058&005981) (GWD-8-Q11)



There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.



A. There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.

B. There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished.

C. There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.

D. Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished.

E. Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.



为什么选A呢，我怎么觉得A读起来很奇怪，有哪位大虾能翻译一下，并解释一下结构吗？

Vivien.c

aeoluseros 发表于 2012-5-20 12:01
as引导的这个是评述子句，务必要记住它的用法，很特殊。刚好新概念里有关于这个句子比较好的阐释，贴过来供 ...

版主太棒了！！！！！

mongmong

正确的句子是There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught.
比如说，按as前后的肯定或否定两个纬度分一分有四种情况，前后都肯定的情况好理解；如果需要表示1)前后都是否定，或者需要表示2)前面肯定，后面否定，又应该怎么写呢？麻烦修改一下我写的。谢谢！
1) There are no legal limits, as there are no legal limits for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught. （如何省略？）

前后都表示否定，这样写没问题，不过as there are no for cod and haddock即可。

2) There are legal limits, as there are no legal limits for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught. (这个句子虽然和原来正确选项正好前后调一调，我总觉得不对；怎么省略呢？)

我也觉得这样的写法逻辑上怪怪的，毕竟这里as的含义是“正如”，不如用There are legal limits, which are absent for cod and haddock, on the size ...

-- by 会员 aeoluseros (2012/5/20 20:18:28)

谢谢Aeo!

aeoluseros

正确的句子是There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught.
比如说，按as前后的肯定或否定两个纬度分一分有四种情况，前后都肯定的情况好理解；如果需要表示1)前后都是否定，或者需要表示2)前面肯定，后面否定，又应该怎么写呢？麻烦修改一下我写的。谢谢！
1) There are no legal limits, as there are no legal limits for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught. （如何省略？）

前后都表示否定，这样写没问题，不过as there are no for cod and haddock即可。

2) There are legal limits, as there are no legal limits for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught. (这个句子虽然和原来正确选项正好前后调一调，我总觉得不对；怎么省略呢？)

我也觉得这样的写法逻辑上怪怪的，毕竟这里as的含义是“正如”，不如用There are legal limits, which are absent for cod and haddock, on the size ...

mongmong

as引导的这个是评述子句，务必要记住它的用法，很特殊。

刚好新概念里有关于这个句子比较好的阐释，贴过来供mongmong参考：
http://sl.iciba.com/viewthread-58-4101-1.shtml

Spiders are not insects, as many people think, nor even nearly related to them一语，我译做“就像很多人所想的那样，蜘蛛不是昆虫，甚至不是昆虫近亲”。为什么正确译法却是“与很多人认为的相反，蜘蛛不是昆虫，甚至也不是昆虫的近亲”？

这问题很难解释。As many people think 这类子句，叫做评述子句（comment clause），用在句子头、尾、中间都可以，说话者可藉此对主要子句稍加论述，例如：As many people know, spiders are not insects / Spiders, as many people know, are not insects / Spiders are not insects, as many people know（很多人都知道，蜘蛛不是昆虫）。

但Spiders are not insects, as many people think / believe却是as many people think / believe they are 的意思。Believe、think 都是 “以为”，和 know（知道）不同。“以为”的事情未必正确。用在否定句之后，as someone thinks / believes 往往是说“并不如某人所想”，例如：Mr Ma is not a patriot, as you believe, but a self-seeking politician （你以为马先生爱国，其实他于国无所爱，只是个追逐私利的政客）。当然，as someone believes 等也可解作“正如某人所想”，但行文必须说清楚，例如：Mr Ma is not a patriot, as you rightly believe（你的判断没错，马先生并不爱国）。

-- by 会员 aeoluseros (2012/5/20 12:01:19)

谢谢aeo童鞋！关于这个前面否定，后面肯定的用法，我明白了。

可是关于前面否定/后面也否定以及前面肯定/后面否定的句子的情况呢？麻烦Aeo看楼楼上~~8楼哈

aeoluseros

as引导的这个是评述子句，务必要记住它的用法，很特殊。

刚好新概念里有关于这个句子比较好的阐释，贴过来供mongmong参考：
http://sl.iciba.com/viewthread-58-4101-1.shtml

Spiders are not insects, as many people think, nor even nearly related to them一语，我译做“就像很多人所想的那样，蜘蛛不是昆虫，甚至不是昆虫近亲”。为什么正确译法却是“与很多人认为的相反，蜘蛛不是昆虫，甚至也不是昆虫的近亲”？

这问题很难解释。As many people think 这类子句，叫做评述子句（comment clause），用在句子头、尾、中间都可以，说话者可藉此对主要子句稍加论述，例如：As many people know, spiders are not insects / Spiders, as many people know, are not insects / Spiders are not insects, as many people know（很多人都知道，蜘蛛不是昆虫）。

但Spiders are not insects, as many people think / believe却是as many people think / believe they are 的意思。Believe、think 都是 “以为”，和 know（知道）不同。“以为”的事情未必正确。用在否定句之后，as someone thinks / believes 往往是说“并不如某人所想”，例如：Mr Ma is not a patriot, as you believe, but a self-seeking politician （你以为马先生爱国，其实他于国无所爱，只是个追逐私利的政客）。当然，as someone believes 等也可解作“正如某人所想”，但行文必须说清楚，例如：Mr Ma is not a patriot, as you rightly believe（你的判断没错，马先生并不爱国）。

mongmong

as 不能重复前面的否定含义，即as there are limits for c and h, their 单指代monkfish 可以，表示其数量deplet.

-- by 会员 lxzdong (2010/3/22 18:12:57)

因为读的不多，我对"as不能重复前面的否定含义"可以理解，但讶异这是什么原理呢？

正确的句子是There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught.


比如说，按as前后的肯定或否定两个纬度分一分有四种情况，前后都肯定的情况好理解；如果需要表示1)前后都是否定，或者需要表示2)前面肯定，后面否定，又应该怎么写呢？麻烦修改一下我写的。谢谢！


1) There are no legal limits, as there are no legal limits for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught. （如何省略？）


2) There are legal limits, as there are no legal limits for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught. (这个句子虽然和原来正确选项正好前后调一调，我总觉得不对；怎么省略呢？)


as的本意是“一样",  又怎么表示前后一个否定一个肯定呢？

-- by 会员 mongmong (2012/5/13 21:02:43)

mongmong

as 不能重复前面的否定含义，即as there are limits for c and h, their 单指代monkfish 可以，表示其数量deplet.

-- by 会员 lxzdong (2010/3/22 18:12:57)

顶一下~

weijiejing

请问A中a circumstance引导的是同位语从句吗? 同位语从句可以修饰前面整句句子?不是只能修饰名词吗?

10gmat

as 不能重复前面的否定含义，即as there are limits for c and h, their 单指代monkfish 可以，表示其数量deplet.

-- by 会员 lxzdong (2010/3/22 18:12:57)

同意lxzdong的话，c 和h是有limit的，而后面的their就是指代monkfish的