ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1563|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

6.16 郁闷的分数

[复制链接]
#
匿名  发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-7-6 09:21:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢山版,我也搞不清楚为啥写作会只有20分。

Reading  Skills Level  Your Performance  
ReadingHigh(22-30)

Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand academic texts in English that require a wide range of reading abilities regardless of the difficulty of the texts.

Test takers who score at the HIGH level, typically

  • have a very good command of academic vocabulary and grammatical structure;
  • can understand and connect information, make appropriate inferences, and synthesize ideas, even when the text is conceptually dense and the language is complex;
  • can recognize the expository organization of a text and the role that specific information serves within the larger text, even when the text is conceptually dense; and
  • can abstract major ideas from a text, even when the text is conceptually dense and contains complex language.
 
Listening  Skills Level  Your Performance  
ListeningHigh(22-30)

Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand conversations and lectures in English that present a wide range of listening demands. These demands can include difficult vocabulary (uncommon terms, or colloquial or figurative language), complex grammatical structures, abstract or complex ideas, and/or making sense of unexpected or seemingly contradictory information.

When listening to lectures and conversations like these, test takers at the HIGH level typically can

  • understand main ideas and important details, whether they are stated or implied;
  • distinguish more important ideas from less important ones;
  • understand how information is being used (for example, to provide evidence for a claim or describe a step in a complex process);
  • recognize how pieces of information are connected (for example, in a cause-and-effect relationship);
  • understand many different ways that speakers use language for purposes other than to give information (for example, to emphasize a point, express agreement or disagreement, or convey intentions indirectly); and
  • synthesize information, even when it is not presented in sequence, and make correct inferences on the basis of that information.
 
Speaking  Skills Level  Your Performance  
Speaking about familiar topicsFair(2.5 - 3.0)

Your responses indicate you are able to speak in English about your personal experiences and opinions in a mostly clear and coherent manner. Your speech is mostly clear with only occasional errors. Grammar and vocabulary are somewhat limited and include some errors. At times, the limitations prevent you from elaborating fully on your ideas, but they do not seriously interfere with overall communication.

 
Speaking about campus situationsLimited(1.5 - 2.0)

Your responses indicate that you have some difficulty speaking in English about information from conversations, newspaper articles, university publications, and so on. While you are able to talk about some of the key information from these sources, limited grammar and vocabulary may prevent you from fully expressing your ideas. Problems with pronunciation make it difficult for listeners to understand you at times.

 
Speaking about academic course contentFair(2.5 - 3.0)

Your responses demonstrate that you are able to speak in English about academic reading and lecture material, with only minor communication problems. For the most part, your speech is clear and easy to understand. However, some problems with pronunciation and intonation may occasionally cause difficulty for the listener. Your use of grammar and vocabulary is adequate to talk about the topics, but some ideas are not fully developed or are inaccurate.

 
Writing  Skills Level  Your Performance  
Writing based on reading and listeningFair(2.5 - 3.5)

You responded to the task, relating the lecture to the reading, but your response indicates weaknesses such as

  • an important idea or ideas may be missing, unclear, or inaccurate;
  • there may be unclarity in how the lecture and the reading passage are related; and/or
  • grammatical mistakes or vague/incorrect uses of words may make the writing difficult to understand.
 
Writing based on knowledge and experienceFair(2.5 - 3.5)

You expressed ideas with reasons, examples, and details, but your response indicated weaknesses such as

  • you may not provide enough specific support and development for your main points;
  • your ideas may be difficult to follow because of how you organize your essay or because of the language you use to connect your ideas; and/or
  • grammatical mistakes or vague/incorrect uses of words may make the writing difficult to understand.
 


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-7-6 22:28:51编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2007-7-6 08:08:00 | 只看该作者

楼主的主观题和客观题差异比较大啊,口语后四题和作文综合题考虑到你的听力基础,应该不差。也就是说,你先看看你口语后四题和综合作文的成绩,如果不是高分,那么估计你可能在表达(复述)上存在问题,自己基本上知道要点,但没能说清要点,当然,也可能是你听懂了,却还不清楚那些听力信息是要点。如果后四题和综合写作分数都很高,那么你就要在独立作文上多下功夫(口语前两题就是缩水的独立作文)。

楼主
发表于 2007-7-6 05:29:00 | 只看该作者

6.16 郁闷的分数


Test Test Date Reading Listening Speaking Writing Total
TELXMLJune 16, 200729 30 20 20 99
复习了一个月, 这个分数对于申请mba来说肯定是不够的了,打算二战了。





[此贴子已经被作者于2007-7-6 5:34:56编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-5 21:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部