一道关于修辞结构的O语法题：Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, prevented f

小目标750

Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.

A. prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of

B. prevented from having its acoustic energy dissipated by

C. its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by

D. its acoustic energy prevented from being dissipated as a result of

E. preventing its acoustic energy from dissipating by

答案是C。

选项E   preventing  逻辑主语是sound   语义不合理

请问如何比较ABCD选项？？？？ 虽然选对了但是比较懵 ，只是最后比较下来选项C语义表达更没有歧义更直接

希望有小伙伴可以指导一下， 或者可以分享一下你们的思路， 我们互相学习~感谢~

典座

蟹黄味蚕豆 发表于 2019-7-14 18:45
ed分词都是就近修饰，那么ab修饰的是distance，C选项是个独立主格，对主句所表述的信息进行补充。类似于eac ...

谢谢

撑胆大饿胆小

正确选项其实是Absolute phrase 用来modify 原题前面整句。absolute phrase 的结构是：

（noun + noun modifier) + clause
或者 顺序颠倒后，如原题：
clause + （noun + noun modifier)




（noun + noun modifier) 相当于modifier, 用来修饰clause 整句

Absolute phrase 在曼哈顿里有详解， 我截图大家看下：

lisa001

小目标750 发表于 2019-7-15 10:06
在外网上看到Ron对于ed分词修辞结构用法的解释，他认为这道题prevented 修饰的不是distance， 而是和prev ...

过去分词应该是不能做非限定，只能做限定。所以修饰主语。

梵希蔓

看一下！               

奎尼米兰达

楼主请问你这道题解决了吗？
我也很在乎SVO，done修饰前面整句话的问题，之前看到这样的结构都当作过去分词只能修饰前面的名词直接排除了，今天看到RON说跟comma, ing一样真的惊了。。但是之前也没有看到过过去分词修饰前面整句话的例子啊感觉很迷。。请问楼主有见过类似例子或者有其他看法吗？

小目标750

蟹黄味蚕豆 发表于 2019-7-15 12:49
感谢指正

小目标750

蟹黄味蚕豆 发表于 2019-7-15 12:49
感谢指正

蟹黄味蚕豆

小目标750 发表于 2019-7-15 10:06
在外网上看到Ron对于ed分词修辞结构用法的解释，他认为这道题prevented 修饰的不是distance， 而是和prev ...

感谢指正

小目标750

蟹黄味蚕豆 发表于 2019-7-14 18:45
ed分词都是就近修饰，那么ab修饰的是distance，C选项是个独立主格，对主句所表述的信息进行补充。类似于eac ...

在外网上看到Ron对于ed分词修辞结构用法的解释，他认为这道题prevented 修饰的不是distance， 而是和preventing一样修饰前面句子和主语， Ron原话是这样说的：

有人问：
In my view, A and B are incorrect because "prevented from" acts as modifier for "distances" - not for sound. Am i right?

Ron 回答：
i don't think so.

remember, "__ed" modifiers are largely equivalent to "__ing" modifiers.
the main difference is that __ed modifiers are "passive", whereas __ing modifiers are "active".
e.g., if a new house was recently built ("passive") on our street, then that house is the house recently built on our street.
if highway 101 extends from los angeles to the oregon border, then highway 101 is the highway extending from los angeles to the oregon border.

ok, getting to the point here ... as a result, comma + "__ed" can follow the same principles as comma + "__ing". namely, it can modify the entire preceding sentence/action/clause.

外网链接：
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/sc-sound-t7263-45.html