ChaseDream
搜索
12345下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 92880|回复: 48
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[校友答疑] LBS vs INSEAD MBA

  [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
#
发表于 2019-4-9 18:08:15 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
希望有这两所学校的校友帮帮忙分析一下选哪个学校:
谢谢各位,在问了快50个两个学校校友之后,楼主选了INSEAD. 正在写申请总如下:

E2E DIY MBA App Process –LBS, INSEAD, Haas, Oxford, Cambridge admitted

Pre MBA Background

- Doing strategy in an multinational insurer: business product strategy , large scale transformation (operation& digital)

- currently based in London, used to be New York
- total work experience: 5 year

- B.S in North American Top Public University

Post MBA Goal:  

- London or China

- Consulting (MBB generalist or Digital Team)

- Tech: Fintech or InsureTech


万分感谢!
- 今年听到的传说中 mckinsey 只招 INSEAD. BCG 是LBS的big sponsor, 去年招了很多LBS的人。
- Amazon LONDON招了很多LBS grads, google 中等

单选投票, 共有 731 人参与投票

投票已经结束

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
收藏收藏26 收藏收藏26
48#
发表于 2023-4-10 13:01:15 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
感谢?
47#
发表于 2023-2-10 03:00:15 | 只看该作者
哈哈哈哈 楼上对话好像在看一道GMAT CR题一样,我想想哟
INSEAD每年招中国人100人,LBS20人,投票结果还是LBS领先,所以LBS更好,以下哪一个是假设
A)投LBS的人更多就可以证明LBS更好
B)投票的人可以客观而准确的的选出更好的,同时读了LBS和INSEAD并且可以精准剔除所有变量来比较两个学校
C)哪个学校更好是可以通过研究两个学校招中国学生数量以及chasedream论坛一个帖子的投票来决定的
D)所有人对于评价哪个学校更好的准则都是一样的
E) 看了这个投票的人会认为LBS更好就不会继续在LBS和INSEAD之间动摇了

纯属玩笑别当真哈哈哈哈,并没有要喷任何人的意思。。。。

46#
发表于 2021-8-19 09:25:07 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
rimes0098 发表于 2020-09-02 20:54:36
你这个的假设是insead的校友都看到了这个投票吗

同样的概率 LBS的校友都看到这个投票了吗
45#
发表于 2020-10-22 21:49:35 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
Insead现在学费是多少啊?
44#
发表于 2020-9-2 20:54:36 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
policeman 发表于 2020-03-26 17:24:07
INSEAD每年招中国MBA100人,LBS 中国MBA 20人。投票结果还是LBS领先。。。说明了...

你这个的假设是insead的校友都看到了这个投票吗
43#
发表于 2020-8-10 13:45:32 | 只看该作者
Consulting & Corporate: same tier and opportunities
Cost advantage: INSEAD > LBS
Finance: LBS > INSEAD
Overall career opportunities: 2Y LBS > 1Y INSEAD
Overall reputation in London/China mainland/Hong Kong: LBS>INSEAD
42#
发表于 2020-6-9 15:54:47 | 只看该作者
看一下!               
41#
发表于 2020-5-25 05:51:51 | 只看该作者
I think the choice between the two comes down to whether your pre-MBA experiences are good enough to support getting into MBB or strategy consulting roles. If you were in IB/consulting/corp strategy/corp dev type of role and you are very ready to make the jump, INSEAD is the clear winner. If not, then I'd probably consider two-year program to give yourself a bit more time.

I picked INSEAD because I had 3 year buy-side M&A experience and 2 year consulting at Deloitte.
40#
发表于 2020-4-27 14:42:21 | 只看该作者
The problem with this premise is that your resume is in the same pile with resumes from all other schools in the cycle.
39#
发表于 2020-4-26 19:56:49 | 只看该作者
Aknmdly 发表于 2020-4-26 13:06
Either LBS/INSEAD being more “elite” than the other is simply not true. Even if we were to go do ...

I don't think it's necssarily correct to measure elitism of schools by "histories". People do have a sense about which program is, in general terms, "better", or "more sought after". In a sense it's the same as most people would say Harvard/ Stanford is more "elite" than Wharton, and Wharton is more "elite" than the rest of M7.

I do think the size of the class matters; and the bigger the worse. Size is not an issue for H and W b/c so many top recruiters come to them to recruit students. When averaged out, everyone still has plenty great options. For other schools, there are fewer top opportunities. By the end of the day, recruiters will have to decide which resumes to put in front of the hiring managers. And everything equal, the more people applied, the less chance your resume is picked.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

NTU MBA
IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-13 07:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部