ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1654|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep08里有道题没明白求指教~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-11-3 14:10:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
Despite recent increases in sales and cash flow that have propelled automobile companies' common stocks to new highs, several industry analysts expect automakers, in order to conserve cash, to set dividends more conservatively than they were.
A. to set dividends more conservatively than they were
B. to set dividends more conservatively than they have been
C. to be more conservative than they have been in setting dividends
D. that they will be more conservative than they were in setting dividends
E. that they will be more conservative than they have been to set dividends

这题答案是C,但我没看明白Ron的解释,C读起来挺顺的但是想不明白B哪里错了。他原话如下:
“whenever you use a parallel structure with omitted/elided words,the EXACT omitted word(s) MUST be present, IN PARALLEL STRUCTURE,elsewhere in the sentence. this means in exactly the same form -no alterations, no tense changes, no nothing. this kills choice (b). that choice ends with "...than they havebeen", which omits a participle: in other words, it's actually"...than they have been ______", where the ______ is clearly seen tobe setting (dividends).
since the EXACT WORD setting doesn't appear anywhere else inthis sentence, the sentence is incorrect.
by contrast, choice (c) is a-ok on this point. this choice also contains"...than they have been (__________)", where the parallel concept,"(more) conservative", actually appears elsewhere in the sentence.”
[size=14.007px]

[size=14.007px]我没太明白他加粗那段话的意思,被省略的词必须在句子其他地方以完全相同的形式出现,是这个意思吗?但是C省略的话没有在句子其他地方出现呀? 他最后解释的“”wherethe parallel concept, "(more) conservative", actually appearselsewhere in the sentence.”[size=14.007px]也没看明白,麻烦各位大大解惑,谢谢!!




收藏收藏 收藏收藏
5#
发表于 2018-5-23 13:31:23 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2017-11-3 22:35:24 | 只看该作者
杀G曼巴 发表于 2017-11-3 20:37
还原回去就是have been (setting)了呀,这是没法比较的
比如说如果是一个过去时态,可以用助动词替代,
Des ...

啊啊明白了,感谢回答!
板凳
发表于 2017-11-3 20:37:22 | 只看该作者
还原回去就是have been (setting)了呀,这是没法比较的
比如说如果是一个过去时态,可以用助动词替代,
Despite recent increases in sales and cash flow that have propelled automobile companies' common stocks to new highs, several industry analysts expect automakers, in order to set dividends more conservatively than they did one year ago
这里did其实是set的一种替代,但是setting在这里没法直接比,更不会替代


沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2017-11-3 20:21:54 | 只看该作者
顶一下 求大大解惑QAQ
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-23 02:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部