ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2896|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] prep07 一题 【650~680】求问

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-11-3 12:27:14 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
15、【650~680】The bones of Majungatholus atopus, ameat-eating dinosaur that is a distant relative of Tyrannosaurus rex andclosely resembles South American predatory dinosaurs, have been discovered inMadagascar.
AThe bones of Majungatholus atopus, a meat-eating dinosaur that is a distantrelative of Tyrannosaurus rex and closely resembles South American predatorydinosaurs, have been discovered in Madagascar.
BThe bones of a meat-eating dinosaur, Majungatholus atopus, a distant relativeof Tyrannosaurus rex and with a close resemblance to South American predatorydinosaurs, has been discovered in Madagascar. (第一个排除,因为主谓不一致)
CIn Madagascar, the bones of a meat-eating dinosaur, Majungatholus atopus,distantly related to Tyrannosaurus rex and closely resembled South Americanpredatory dinosaurs, have been discovered.
DA distant relative of Tyrannosaurus rex, bearing a close resemblance to SouthAmerican predatory dinosaurs is Majungatholus atopus, a meat-eating dinosaur,the bones of which have been discovered in Madagascar.
EA distant relative of Tyrannosaurus rex and closely resembling South Americanpredatory dinosaurs, the bones of a meat-eating dinosaur, Majungatholus atopus,have been discovered in Madagascar.

这一题选择A,我之前选择的是c,ron说明了c项目里面的平行结构不对。
C选项 distantly related 和 closely resembled 并不平行。主要是因为related是分词作定语,resembled是动词的过去形式。无法是平行结构。

这里好奇的想请教一下关于D选项,为什么D选项不行。也读的通,大体意思感觉也没改变。但是gmatL上解释是过分改变了句子意思。D选项搞不懂错在哪里?怎么改变的?

收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
地板
发表于 2018-7-9 13:42:20 | 只看该作者
D项: bearing a close resemblance相像是一个动物Majungatholus atopus;汉语都是逻辑不合理awkward
E项:一个近亲动物...骨头..(骨头修饰动物,应该近似动物去修饰动物)
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2017-11-4 23:47:55 | 只看该作者
xsq805 发表于 2017-11-3 17:05
D的话,修饰比较混乱,拆开来看:
1)a distant relative of TR 是同位语,修饰恐龙“Maj atopus”,但是句 ...

感谢!最受用的是这句~~“无论哪种modifier都是,离它要修饰的词越近,意思就越清晰。”
沙发
发表于 2017-11-3 17:05:06 | 只看该作者
D的话,修饰比较混乱,拆开来看:
1)a distant relative of TR 是同位语,修饰恐龙“Maj atopus”,但是句子中恐龙在 “bearing..." 的后面,距离太远了。以至于按照目前的句型来说,它变成修饰主语 ”bones” 了,不make sense
2)bearing ....,作为典型的“COMMA + V-ING” 修饰主句主语,但是它跟主语之间还隔着一个modifier呢,再一次距离太远,另外,主句是 bones have been discovered,这个modifier 修饰主句,还是意思不对。
3)a meat-eating dianosaur,与“a distant relative of TR" 一样,位置错了,导致意思不对

无论哪种modifier都是,离它要修饰的词越近,意思就越清晰。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-23 02:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部