ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2027|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG-749 关于the same as

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-9-20 14:59:54 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.

(A) While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.
(B) While the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants, the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity they generate more expensive.
(C) Even though it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes the electricity they generate more expensive.
(D) It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, whereas the electricity they generate is more expensive, stemming from the fixed costs of building nuclear plants.
(E) The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as other types of power plants, but the electricity they generate is made more expensive because of the fixed costs stemming from building nuclear plants.

ACD选项中是the same to do as to do的形式,补充完整是 it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as (to run)other types of power plants.
所以CD选项中的for是多余的。

E选项中,x the same as y的形式,补充完整是 The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as (the cost of runining) other types of power plants.
HERL讲解中说是用for替代了of running,不直接用of是因为running也省略了。如果直接是of的话,会被认为是其它核电站的成本,而非运营成本。所以E选项少了for,B选项正确。
这里介词for不能省略。



收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
板凳
发表于 2018-8-6 13:05:46 | 只看该作者
ai559031 发表于 2017-9-20 15:24
這題答案是B吧??
不太懂樓主所說的 “BC选项中的fors是多余的” 是什麼意思

楼主说的CD选项呀
沙发
发表于 2017-9-20 15:24:58 | 只看该作者
這題答案是B吧??
不太懂樓主所說的 “BC选项中的fors是多余的” 是什麼意思

這裡必須要補出for,原因如下:

不補出for的話, 會有歧異:變成cost of running nuclear plants (事情) vs  power plants (名詞)
相反的, 如果補出for的話, 看的人就會知道是在比較"運轉核電廠所需成本" 與“運轉其他電廠所需成本“, 是在比較兩件事情

其實我覺得省略這件事還是必須要回歸到語意來判斷
不果如果真的要說一個歸納的話,
大概就是像我圖片中的那樣
(因為太多字+我很懶惰, 所以原諒我用拍照,就不另外打字了)

痾...不知道為什麼我的圖片明明是正的,上傳卻反過來了..

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 00:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部