关于RON总结的ing现在分词的一点疑惑

玛德滞涨

-- the subject of the preceding clause should also make sense as the agent of the -ING action.

examples:
Joe broke the window, angering his father. -->this sentence makes sense, because it correctly implies that joe"a ngered his father".
the window was broken by Joe, angering his father.--> this sentence doesn't make sense, because it implies that the window(i.e., not joe himself) angered joe's father.

my brother tricked me, disappointing Dad --> implies that dad is disappointed in my brother for tricking me (and not necessarily disappointed in me for being tricked).
i was tricked by my brother, disappointing Dad --> implies that  dad is disappointed in me because i fell for my brother's trick (and not that he's disappointed in my brother for tricking me).

实战中需要考虑这一点吗，后面的ving的逻辑主语需要和前面主句的主语一致？
我怎么觉得是主句的整个句子来做后面ving的逻辑主语啊？
有没有大神可以解释一下 或者举些反驳RON这一点的GMAT中的正确句子啊？？

玛德滞涨

elusive 发表于 2016-3-22 17:11
他说的话都是对的，真理，没法反驳。

他实际上说的是 v-ing修饰的是主语+谓语，这个修饰主语差不多。

哦 貌似是因为表直接结果 这里drawing也不能作为直接结果 所以只能做定语

玛德滞涨

elusive 发表于 2016-3-22 17:11
他说的话都是对的，真理，没法反驳。

他实际上说的是 v-ing修饰的是主语+谓语，这个修饰主语差不多。

就是这道题！疑惑
解释说的因为drawing不能表伴随修饰前面的现在完成时，所以只能作定语修饰就近的adulthood
那如果表结果呢。。。？不就能说得通了