ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3607|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] SC一道题的小问题关于in that

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-3-17 15:34:38 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
请问大家有没有一个说法是,in that 优于for 优于because 优于because of 的,因为之前我们老师是这么说的,然后做题也一直很顺,直到看到了这道题:

The Olympic Games helped to keep peace among the pugnacious states of the Greek world in that a sacred truce was proclaimed during the festival's month.

(A) world in that a sacred truce was proclaimed during the festival's month
(B) world, proclaiming a sacred truce during the festival's month
(C)   world when they proclaimed a sacred truce for the festival month
(D) world, for a sacred truce was proclaimed during the month of the festival
(E) world by proclamation of a sacred truce that was for the month of the festival

以下是gmac给的解释:
Idiom;   Rhetorical construction
This sentence depends on using the correct conjunction to join two independent clauses. In that is a conjunction that means inasmuch as; because in that has largely gone out of use, it is considered stilted and overly formal. It also uses two words when one would do. In this sentence, the second clause explains the first one, so the conjunction for, meaning because, is the most appropriate choice for joining the two independent clauses of the compound sentence. Festival's month is an awkward and imprecise use of the possessive; during the month of the festival is clearer.

A    In that is stilted and overly formal.
B     It is not clear who would be doing the proclaiming; a clause is preferable to a phrase here.
C     They is ambiguous, possibly referring to either the states or the Games. The phrase truce for the festival month loses the sense that
it's to take place for the duration of the month.
D    Correct. In this sentence, the conjunction for joins the two clauses correctly and economically.
E    Wordy and awkward construction.
A的选项解释是太僵硬不自然而且过于正式,所以大家能回答我一下是不是真的没有这个规律:in that 优于for 优于because 优于because of
谢谢啦~


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
15#
发表于 2016-5-24 21:46:05 | 只看该作者
请救非洲大象 发表于 2016-5-24 18:41
谢谢!也就是说都有可能!要根据句意分析啦?这个不能作为排除依据咯? ...

我把我之前的回答用红字标了部分,方便理解。

是的,with短语用法比较多变。
不能说with结构一定是错的。所以遇到后不要第一时间排除,先看选项里有没有其他基本的语法错误。
14#
发表于 2016-5-24 18:41:45 | 只看该作者
医生吃鱼 发表于 2016-5-24 15:27
这道题比较特殊,一直被拿出来讨论,我引用下我之前在别的帖子里的回复:

逗号+with结构,修饰的是逗号 ...

谢谢!也就是说都有可能!要根据句意分析啦?这个不能作为排除依据咯?
13#
发表于 2016-5-24 15:27:20 | 只看该作者
请救非洲大象 发表于 2016-5-23 20:20
您好 我知道啦 在请教您一个问题呀:with 型独立主格,与主句形成紧密的逻辑联系,形式为:
由“with        +宾语 ...

这道题比较特殊,一直被拿出来讨论,我引用下我之前在别的帖子里的回复:

逗号+with结构,修饰的是逗号前面的整个句子或整个动作。
例1:第二题中,Visitors to the park have often looked up into the leafy canopy and seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, with(修饰的是红色部分) arms and legs hanging like socks on a clothesline.
例2:OG16-Verbal-SC91,The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon were built on a spectacular scale,with(修饰红色部分) more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each,connected by a complex regional system of roads.
12#
发表于 2016-5-24 15:24:17 | 只看该作者
请救非洲大象 发表于 2016-5-23 20:20
您好 我知道啦 在请教您一个问题呀:with 型独立主格,与主句形成紧密的逻辑联系,形式为:
由“with        +宾语 ...

同意!               
11#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-5-24 15:01:06 | 只看该作者
请救非洲大象 发表于 2016-5-24 14:54
sc部分有英文答案解析吗?谢谢

http://forum.chasedream.com/foru ... B%E6%8E%92%E7%89%88
这是我看到的原帖,你看下有用不
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-5-24 14:58:28 | 只看该作者
请救非洲大象 发表于 2016-5-24 14:54
sc部分有英文答案解析吗?谢谢

因为就是og,所以只要看og2016就好了呀~
9#
发表于 2016-5-24 14:54:03 | 只看该作者
悠悠翎翎 发表于 2016-5-24 10:36
你说的是og2016,word版本吗?sc 我有单独的排版好的,其他没有,要么

sc部分有英文答案解析吗?谢谢
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-5-24 10:36:59 | 只看该作者
请救非洲大象 发表于 2016-5-23 16:12
请问题主,你的word2016版本在哪里下载的呀?我想做电子笔记一直到不到word版本的 哭哭~ ...

你说的是og2016,word版本吗?sc 我有单独的排版好的,其他没有,要么
7#
发表于 2016-5-23 20:20:53 | 只看该作者
医生吃鱼 发表于 2016-5-23 18:22
OG SC的重要性是第一名!
但是在碰到错题了,不能全信OG的答案解释,还是要上论坛看讨论贴。 ...

您好 我知道啦 在请教您一个问题呀:with 型独立主格,与主句形成紧密的逻辑联系,形式为:
由“with        +宾语+宾补”构成的复合结构,在句中可作状语,表示伴随。这一结构中的宾语补足语
可由现在分词、过去分词、形容词、副词或介词短语等来充当

Visitors to the park have often looked into the leafy canopy and seen monkeys sleeping on the
branches, with arms and legs hanging like socks on a clothesline.   (来自prep07大神笔记)

这句话伴随状语到底修饰的是主句主语visitors,还是monkeys呢?句意理解肯定是monkeys,但是伴随状语的主语不应该只能是主句主语吗?有点儿混乱的说。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-24 16:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部