[求助] og16 31题

木子考拉

31. The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can, in part, be explained as a very rapid movement of people from one end of North America to the other.
(A) The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can, in part, be explained as
(B) Thule artifacts being remarkably similar throughout a vast region, one explanation is
(C) That Thule artifacts are remarkably similar throughout a vast region is, in part, explainable as
(D) One explanation for the remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region is that there was
(E) Throughout a vast region Thule artifacts are remarkably similar, with one explanation for this being 答案是D 没问题


这是OG解答


Logical predication; Grammatical construction; Rhetorical construction The intended meaning of the sentence is that the rapid movement of people across North America is one explanation of the similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region. As worded, however, the sentence is illogical: The sentence indicates that the similarity in artifacts was a rapid movement of people, which makes no sense. Instead of equating similarity with movement, the sentence needs to identify this movement of people as a cause of similarity among artifacts.
A  As worded, this version of the sentence makes the illogical statement that the similarity among artifacts is explainable as a very rapid movement. It should specify that the similarity of artifacts may be a consequence of the rapid population movement.
B This version of the sentence is syntactically awkward, and leaves unclear what the main subject, one explanation is supposed to be an explanation of.
C Like (A), this version of the sentence equates the similarity of artifacts with the movement of people, when a causal connection is what is intended. D Correct. This version adequately expresses the intended causal connection.
E This version is awkward, introducing the causal connection with the unnecessarily wordy and indirect string of prepositional phrases, with one explanation for this. . . .




1.为什么OG上对A的句意解释是 “相似是迁移的结果”   我理解的A的句意是  “相似是迁移”  这二者有什么区别吗?  是不是as的意思导致了解读句意的不同，OG解释AS做‘因为’的意思，而我理解的as 是当 ‘作为’ 的意思   到底应该是那种呀？
2.关于B选项，有NN能解释一下吗？虽然知道他不对，可是就是不知道怎么说它到底如何错的，OG解答完全不理解的样子。    关于B选项前面这个修饰语还有些疑惑，being前面的 Thule artifacts 在语法结构上是做什么的，暗示了什么。这个可以把这个Thule artifacts being remarkably similar throughout a vast region当initial modifier来看吗？ Being在这里到底是什么性质？


跪求解答呀！！！！！！跪求有人能详细分析一下B选项！如果有相关知识点就更好啦！！！！！

瓶子叮咚响

看一下！               

蛋卷酱

看一下！               

Charline_chang

chrislty 发表于 2018-5-8 23:20
聚焦A和D，这题考查了用词细微变化带来不同的意思，需要通过积累来体会。

这个要用逻辑理解explain/explan ...

这个解释 有点厉害，懂了 谢谢。
主要是对A be explained as B 的理解。
如果理解为 B以解释A，那么 逻辑上说的通。
但是如果知道 A be explained as B ， B 是A的另外一种说法。即 A 是 B，那么 相似性是运动 就很奇怪。
对于C 选项，that 这句话 是运动 ，逻辑错。

lisa001

快乐女孩 发表于 2015-12-8 21:12
我很想问下C，THAT 引导了一个主语从句，所以is是对的呀，that引导的主语从句表示一个事，这个事被解释为后 ...

That不是it，不能作形式主语，如果放句首，句子就变成 That  is explainable as.. that究竟是什么呢？

lisa001

不是牛，试着解释下。
因为逻辑上，不能说similarity can be explained as movement.，所以这里将as作因为的解释。其实就是GMAT利用一词多义设的陷阱，如果一开始你理解成“因为”答案显而易见的是D.

KALAI255

A我还是不懂，明明读整句的话还是artificial的相似性可以被解释为人类大迁徙啊。。为什么只理解成similarity is motivation然后说这个错呢？D如果说它错的话也可以说它头重脚轻啊。。。

DreamTurelater

chrislty 发表于 2018-5-8 23:20
聚焦A和D，这题考查了用词细微变化带来不同的意思，需要通过积累来体会。

这个要用逻辑理解explain/explan ...

同意！               

甜筒海盗

diuab 发表于 2018-5-3 19:09
对，应该是as的意思。1. function as; 2. equation as; 3. stage as.function as: in a role of: I act as ...

同意！               

Titles

cdream20122012 发表于 2017-1-14 09:13
“1、GMAT考试在我们通常使用的there be句型中，以下几种表达必定错。 (1)there could be done sth. (2)t ...

看一下！               

yammm

[搬运外网解释，附上原网址]https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-remarkable-similarity-of-thule-artifacts-throughout-a-vast-region-203495.html
A. The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can, in part, be explained as --- ‘explained as’ is wrong in the context it should be ‘explained by’

B. Thule artifacts being remarkable similar throughout a vast region (no verb), one explanation is—‘being remarkable’ used as modifier is not acceptable

C. That Thule artifacts are remarkable similar throughout a vast region, in part, explainable as – a fragment

D. One explanation for the remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts through a vast region is that there was – the best choice
E. Throughout a vast region Thule artifacts are remarkable similar, with one explanation for this being –
Remarkable similar – two adjectives in sequence is weird, it should be ‘remarkably similar’

_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509