ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1848|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] og 16 sc 113

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2015-10-3 14:21:34 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
Marconi’s conception of the radio was as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for
private conversation; instead, it is precisely the opposite, a tool for communicating
with a large, public audience.
(A) Marconi’s conception of the radio was as a substitute for the telephone,
a tool for private conversation; instead, it is
(B) Marconi conceived of the radio as a substitute for the telephone, a tool
for private conversation, but which is
(C) Marconi conceived of the radio as a tool for private conversation that
could substitute for the telephone; instead, it has become
(D) Marconi conceived of the radio to be a tool for private conversation, a
substitute for the telephone, which has become
(E) Marconi conceived of the radio to be a substitute for the telephone, a
tool for private conversation, other than what it is,

知道其他的不正确,但不知道为什么选C, that 在C中指代的是谁,a tool 还是private conversation, 要是临近修饰的话,那就应该是conversation,那这样的话这个选项好像就有问题了。

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
5#
发表于 2016-9-12 04:57:26 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
地板
发表于 2016-7-31 23:35:05 | 只看该作者
研究一晚上…我来自问自答了…楼楼的提问,that从句和for private conversation一起修饰a tool.
it指代radio,因为Ron说,pronoun ambiguity isn't always -- or even usually -- a fatal error。
板凳
发表于 2016-7-31 21:00:05 | 只看该作者
elusive 发表于 2016-4-13 11:08
B里面a tool for private conversation修饰的是a substitute ,应该是修饰修饰radio。此外不同从句应该句子 ...

那第二句,instead,it has become不会出现指代不清的现象吗?it应该指代radio,但是根据就近原则又指代telephone,这样直接用it不会造成歧义吗?
沙发
发表于 2016-4-13 11:08:01 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 08:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部