ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) had long been expected to announce a reduction in output to bolster sagging oil prices, but officials of the organization just recently announced that the group will pare daily production by 1.5 million barrels by the beginning of next year, but only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, were to trim output by a total of 500,000 barrels a day.

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3007|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助大神们 og16 sc第40题,og13也有此题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2015-7-29 17:53:40 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
40. The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) had long been expected to announce a reduction in output to bolster sagging oil prices, but officials of the organization just recently announced that the group will pare daily production by 1.5 million barrels by the beginning of next year, but only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, were to trim output by a total of 500,000 barrels a day.
(A) year, but only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, were to trim output
(B) year, but only if the output of non-OPEC nations, which includes Norway, Mexico, and Russia, is trimmed
(C) year only if the output of non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, would be trimmed
(D) year only if non-OPEC nations, which includes Norway, Mexico, and Russia, were trimming output
(E) year only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, trim output

c选项的including是否有以output为主语的嫌疑?og解释没有提到,求解。including修饰前面紧挨的n还是说可以越过mission 作用的preposition phrase修饰中心词。 非常感谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
9#
发表于 2015-8-21 03:26:59 | 只看该作者
including呼应前面的中心词output,如果C选项改为如下则正确:

(C*) year only if the output of non-OPEC nations, including those of Norway, Mexico, and Russia, would be trimmed
8#
发表于 2015-8-20 21:37:14 | 只看该作者
including应当修饰output,因为动名词形式的后置定语是修饰前面主语的中心词
The output of nations, 明显output 是中心词。
这是动名词的特殊情况,而其他形式的定语从句像是that,which都是修饰最近名词
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2015-8-13 08:55:18 | 只看该作者
未来你听见了吗 发表于 2015-8-12 19:30
非大神尝试解答下:
根据RON所说,‘comma+including’ modifies the PRECEDING NOUN, 也就是说他与which ...

谢谢亲解释!
6#
发表于 2015-8-12 19:30:57 | 只看该作者
catherine27629 发表于 2015-8-4 20:04
谢谢!可是我还是觉得preposition phrase也算modifier的一种,虽然不是-ing modifier,勿拍。。。所以修 ...

非大神尝试解答下:
根据RON所说,‘comma+including’ modifies the PRECEDING NOUN, 也就是说他与which用法类似,修饰先行词,这个句子中的先行词是nations,不会跳跃到output上。
欢迎拍砖~~
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2015-8-4 20:04:00 | 只看该作者
yeye523 发表于 2015-7-30 21:36
including没有嫌疑,including不是modifier的一种,只是长得像现在分词而已,其实是介词。。不需纠结它的修 ...

谢谢!可是我还是觉得preposition phrase也算modifier的一种,虽然不是-ing modifier,勿拍。。。所以修饰的是中心词还是可以修饰前面紧挨的preposition phrase中的名词?
地板
发表于 2015-7-30 21:36:56 | 只看该作者
including没有嫌疑,including不是modifier的一种,只是长得像现在分词而已,其实是介词。。不需纠结它的修饰问题。
Comma+ing的例外情况:including不是adverbial modifier,而是作为介词:
"INCLUDING" is an EXCEPTION to the otherwise robust rules for comma+ing modifiers.

when you see "comma + including", you should think of "including" as a preposition, not as an -ing modifier. therefore, "including X" will become a prepositional phrase that describes the stuff preceding the comma.“
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2015-7-30 15:30:58 | 只看该作者
求助大神版主 们
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2015-7-29 23:25:43 | 只看该作者
自己顶一下
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-28 19:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部