- UID
- 988424
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2014-3-12
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
一點點的個人意見:
1. 不少學校的MPA的確是有econoics & financial policy stream可選, 不過這和一個standard master in economics / finance的角度有一點不同. 會更多policy, regulation, macro方向, 對國際生找工作來說其實並不算太好 (non-STEM, first focus is public sector (i.e. visa))
2. Columbia: 明顯Financial engineeering, 優於Math Fina 和OR, 接著是統計. 所謂有沒有水專業, 其實大家心中有數: 由收生質素, class size, career service, industrial reputation, 所以non flagship program的也無謂自我安慰........當然教學質量分明未必太明顯, 不過前提是學生要有一個clear career plan & goal和懂選課和在沒有足夠peer pressue的環境下去做比flagship program的同學更多的career preparation.......(which most of them don't, and thus 水 is a comment for the averag but not any individual)
The same holds for any university indeed, but within those famous university, Columbia is the one that host the most $$-earning-only program. |
|