ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2379|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[作文互改] Argue 17 求拍砖

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-10-17 20:02:29 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
17) The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station.

To reverse a decline in listener numbers, our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock-music format. The decline has occurred despite population growth in our listening area, but that growth has resulted mainly from people moving here after their retirement. We must make listeners of these new residents. We could switch to a music format tailored to their tastes, but a continuing decline in local sales of recorded music suggests limited interest in music. Instead we should change to a news and talk format, a form of radio that is increasingly popular in our area.

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.





In this memorandum, the manager considers that in order to enhance the popularity of their radio station, they should change to a news and talk format.However, this argument is based on the manager's view rather than an objective direction.A lot of specific information related to this argument is missing, which makes the argument less convincing.



It is unfair for the manager to infer that the decline in listener numbers has a direct relation with the current rock music format.The inference made by the manager is less convincing, since a number of other factors besides the rock music format could have an influence in the number of listeners.Perhaps the rock music is not the only program of WWAC.Recent days, WWAC put much more advertisement on their radio program.These advertisements, however, are mainly about real estate business and have little relation with the everyday life of the public.For this reason, the number of listeners declines.Since no specific evidence shows that it is the rock music program that causes the decline in listeners directly, this argument is unconvincing.If the manager would like to strengthen this argument, he or she is encouraged to provide other information to show the direct relation between the rock music program and the decline of the listener.



Besides, showing that more retire people come to live in the area, the manager implicit that they are the new listeners of WWAC.However, this implication could be unbelievable.Though these people come to live in the area, no information shows that they would like to listen to the radio and thus could be the potential listeners of WWAC.It is likely that those people in their sixties and seventies could not hear the radio clearly.As a result, they prefer to watch TV or go for a walk outside in their free time and care nothing about the radio program.Under that condition, even though WWAC change their major program, it is less likely that they are going to attract more listeners.If specific information shows that, in fact, few of these new residents prefer to listen to the radio, this argument is more likely to be weaken.



Moreover, the manager assumes that decline in local sale of recorded music means people in this area have little interest in music. However, this could never be true.Buying music recorded and listen to music on the radio could be different, because you just open your radio and do not have to pay for your music.What is more, with the development of internet, those who love music could download their favorite music from the website, which saves both time and money. That means decline in local sale of recorded music never means that people who live in this area put less interest in music. If specific evidence shows that people here still would like to listen to music, this argument is likely to be weaken.



To sum up, this argument misses a number of specific evidence.Without the help of those evidences, we could never say coherently that the decision of the manager could enhance the number of the audience of WWAC.Actually, this argument is less convincing.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-10-18 10:23:37 | 只看该作者
, they should change to a news and talk format.

什么意思?没看懂。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-18 19:56:29 | 只看该作者
他们应该改成新闻和谈话节目。。求正确表达法。。
地板
发表于 2012-10-18 21:13:24 | 只看该作者
change……into……也许比to更好
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-7 03:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部