ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1483|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[作文互改] argument 求拍!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-9-21 01:37:49 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
128. The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager.

"One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one-third of what it used to be. Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment are not yet available, the change will obviously result in a considerable savings for Sunnyside Corporation, since the corporation must pay for water each month. Except for a few complaints about low water pressure, no problems with showers have been reported since the adjustment. Clearly, modifying showerheads to restrict water flow throughout all twelve buildings in the Sunnyside Towers complex will increase our profits further."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.



The owner of the apartment complex suggests the manager should modify showerheads in all buildings to reduce water usage and thus increase profit. The argument used in support of such suggestion, however, needs further evaluation, because some crucial evidences were not included. Some of the evidences needed are the actual cost of modification, the actual usage of water before and after, and the effects of the complaints.

The owner here did not present actual water usage before and after the modification. This evidence is one of the most important in determining the effectiveness of the modified showerhead. If the water usage indeed decreases significantly after the adjustment, then the argument is strengthened. On the contrary, if water usage changes little, then the suggestion of applying the modification to all buildings is groundless.

In addition to change in water usage, the cost of modifying the showerheads should be included in the argument. If the money spent on adjusting showerheads is substantial and not likely to be compensated by saving on water in the near future, then such modification will not possibly increase profit, hence weakening the argument.

Also the owner indicated some complains about low water pressure. He did not go into details of the seriousness and magnitudes of the complaints. The attitudes of the tenants, or costumers, are important determinant of profit. If they are not satisfied with the water pressure and decide to move to other apartments, then the owner will certainly lose more money than he can save on water.

Before the manager makes the decision of adjusting all showerheads, he or she should discuss the importance of these evidences with the owner.

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-9-21 10:58:31 | 只看该作者
可以展开写写,字数有多少?
板凳
发表于 2012-9-21 10:59:30 | 只看该作者
觉得作者的英文基础不错,展开写写。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-21 22:05:22 | 只看该作者
就是不知道怎么展开了。。。300多一点吧。。。
5#
发表于 2012-9-23 20:04:30 | 只看该作者
展开,需要你能把自己认为很明显的东西再具体点写出来,不要认为你写的所有人都明白,如果你不把某些推理的过程详细地写出来,也许是没人能看懂的,尤其是注重逻辑推理的西方人
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-22 14:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部