MBA ---- HKU VS HKUST

jamesyeah

进入到2009年，大家说说HKU, HKUST 哪个学校的MBA更好？

详细分解：

1. 课程

2. 就业

3. 校友网络

4. 对个人的职业发展（金融方向）

Open to discuss!~

岁月如歌

应该说是不分仲伯，课程规模等各方面类似。HKUST近几年发展的不错，在国际上的认可度也较HKU更有名气一些。但HKU最近的课程调整和变化也蛮有吸引力的。最好到两个学校看看，喜欢哪个就读哪个呗。

ciscogeek

原来说是科大的金融不错，可是现在的经济形势。

港大学校牌子老，最近又搞了很好的合作。

我投港大一票。最后是实地考察一下哦。

ralphdu

以下是引用jamesyeah在2009-2-7 18:07:00的发言：

进入到2009年，大家说说HKU, HKUST 哪个学校的MBA更好？

详细分解：

1. 课程   HKU relies on its partners---LBS and Columbia, all students will spend some months in either place, UST obviously can offer more electives in finance by its own faculty.

2. 就业  No such school can guarantee you a placement under current global woes. HKUST seems has very good career service(they claims), whilst some one complains in CD that CUHK' career service sucks. WSJ reported last year that Asian employers didn't value MBA as much as US counterparts.

3. 校友网络  In terms of alumni of b-schools(not Univ.-wise here), CUHK is the best as its management education cultivate most of local HK business leaders. HKUST establishes its MBA program in earlier 90', while HKU MBA is an off-campus part-time programme starts in Shanghai at its very beginning, which IMO doesn't worth a nickle of HKD.

4. 对个人的职业发展（金融方向）Vote for HKUST, compare to HKU. Again, HKU MBA isn't a serious programme, and you could find hundreds of guys graduate from "Fudan-HKU IMBA become your so-called "Shanghai alumni network". If such network is what you want, why bother go to hk to do HKU mba at higher cost, while you can easily obtain one in Shanghai.

Open to discuss!~

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-2-9 17:11:22编辑过]

jamesyeah

Thanks so much!

And looking forward more discussion to know both program better since generaly speaking, every one only has one opportunity to have the MBA education.

AK47_2009

OOO

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-2-17 15:14:03编辑过]