求拍 ISSUE 63

waywong

There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take.  In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might  not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

提纲
1.人类似乎真的没有必要花费大量的金钱去保护这些生物。钱可以用在许多地方去提高我们的生活。
2.但是也不是像作者所说的那样完全没必要去打救濒临绝种动物。因为生态的多样性。还有很多生物是因为我们的原因才灭绝的。再者，很多濒临灭绝的生物有可能对我们有用。
3.从道德层面上，我们应该遵循众生平等


At hand is the issue about whether or not society should take extraordinary efforts to save endangered animal or plant species.The speakers point out that we have little justification to deal with this problem, statement that is in fact extreme, however.The author overlooked too many aspects, such as the integrity of the ecological system, the same right for animals or plants to live.So, frankly, I don’t agree with this statement and my reasons are as follows.



Indeed, Humans seems to be no need to save the endangered species by means of quite a quantity of money.With this money, we can do a lot of things beneficial for us.For example, we can use this money to help many people who are in poverty, to create more jobs opportunities and to make more products instead of depending on the species near extinction.Furthermore, the most foundation of ecological system is evolution, maybe the extinction of the species is only the conclusion of the ecological evolution.



However, we cannot say that people really don’t have to help the endangered species out of danger.On one hand, people should consider the ecological diversity of the earth.If too many creatures disappear from human’s view, the life will become boring and tedium, which certainly will cause negative influences on people’s daily activities.On the other hand, some animals and plants, which shouldn’t be near extinct, are endangered due to the improvement of human’s modern technology. Besides, perhaps it is only a process of ecological evolution that part of species will die out eventually.But if the process causes adverse effects on human life, it means a lot for human to take actions to prevent the endangered species from dying out.



And from the moral, we should save the endangered animals and plants in light of a very simple reason that all creatures have the equal right to survive in the world.We cannot be sure any more that it is natural brings us life, minds, technology and helps us realize our dreams.For example, The Wrights made the first aircraft successful according to the birds’ shape; San Feng Zhang, a martial artist in our country, created a method to strengthen our bodies by watching the fighting between a turtle and a snake.It is apparently that we can’t live without various creatures.



In sum, the immediate task is that we should act to protect the endangered species and to prevent them from disappearing rather than debate on whether there is a need to do our best to save these species.Some institutions has already stepped the step to save lives.Like SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, has called on people to join hundreds of scientists who have signed on in support of ending invasive chimpanzee research.

第三次写ISSUE
这是没怎么查单词、限制时间写的。写出来后感觉单词用得很简单。
请问考试中写出这种文章可以么？？
求版主指导

普渡哥

第三点是佛教观点，美国人可以不一定接受。
3.从道德层面上，我们应该遵循众生平等


可以说尊重生命。

waywong

第三点是佛教观点，美国人可以不一定接受。
3.从道德层面上，我们应该遵循众生平等


可以说尊重生命。

-- by 会员 普渡哥 (2012/4/25 9:58:26)

版主。我想问问。那个众生平等。我在文章中写的是all creatures have the equal right  to survive这样可以么？？
还有我的文章的用词很简单。我估计我的临场用词就是这样了。。这在考试中可以么？？？

竹林中人

第三点是佛教观点，美国人可以不一定接受。
3.从道德层面上，我们应该遵循众生平等


可以说尊重生命。

-- by 会员 普渡哥 (2012/4/25 9:58:26)

版主。我想问问。那个众生平等。我在文章中写的是all creatures have the equal right  to survive这样可以么？？
还有我的文章的用词很简单。我估计我的临场用词就是这样了。。这在考试中可以么？？？

-- by 会员 waywong (2012/4/25 10:08:51)

更简单的是 are equal to survive

waywong

第三点是佛教观点，美国人可以不一定接受。
3.从道德层面上，我们应该遵循众生平等


可以说尊重生命。

-- by 会员 普渡哥 (2012/4/25 9:58:26)

版主。我想问问。那个众生平等。我在文章中写的是all creatures have the equal right  to survive这样可以么？？
还有我的文章的用词很简单。我估计我的临场用词就是这样了。。这在考试中可以么？？？

-- by 会员 waywong (2012/4/25 10:08:51)

更简单的是 are equal to survive

-- by 会员 竹林中人 (2012/4/26 11:00:48)

好的..谢谢版主..我回去再改改...
还有版主
我想问问这样用简单单词写作的文章可以上得了考场么·

竹林中人

[quote]

第三点是佛教观点，美国人可以不一定接受。
3.从道德层面上，我们应该遵循众生平等


可以说尊重生命。

-- by 会员 普渡哥 (2012/4/25 9:58:26)

版主。我想问问。那个众生平等。我在文章中写的是all creatures have the equal right  to survive这样可以么？？
还有我的文章的用词很简单。我估计我的临场用词就是这样了。。这在考试中可以么？？？

-- by 会员 waywong (2012/4/25 10:08:51)

更简单的是 are equal to survive

-- by 会员 竹林中人 (2012/4/26 11:00:48)

好的..谢谢版主..我回去再改改...
还有版主
我想问问这样用简单单词写作的文章可以上得了考场么·

-- by 会员 waywong (2012/4/27 15:03:14)

[/quot可以，但你要保证写对每一个句子，而且尽量地道。