ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6341|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教OG语法

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-3-17 23:55:00 | 只看该作者

请教OG语法


242. Even their most ardent champions concede that no less than a technical or scientific breakthrough is necessary before solar cells can meet the goal of providing one percent of the nation's energy needs.
(A)    that no less than a technical or scientific breakthrough is            necessary
(B)    that nothing other than a technical or scientific breakthrough         is needed
(C)    that a technical or scientific breakthrough is necessary
(D)    the necessity for an occurrence of a technical or scientific            breakthrough
(E)    the necessity for a technical or scientific breakthrough         occurring

按白勇的说法,原句有强调语气必须保留,可以本题却认为累赘。真有点无从下手了。

243. Some scientists have been critical of the laboratory tests conducted by the Federal Drug Administration on the grounds that the amounts of suspected carcinogens fed to animals far exceeds those that humans could consume.
(A)    far exceeds those that humans could consume
(B)    exceeds by far those humans can consume
(C)    far exceeds those humans are able to consume
(D)    exceed by far those able to be consumed by humans
(E)    far exceed those that humans could consume

本题E中的those that都省略,是不是更好?
沙发
发表于 2003-3-18 00:47:00 | 只看该作者
xiers bro

242.
A, C, E are obviously wrong, out!
B&D  "no less than" 不代表语气吧!照白勇所说影响语气的几种:1、情态动词;2 副 词;

请体会。

243  amounts exceed human, 明显比较对象不对等!

提醒:比较是GMAT的重中之中!请仔细体会OG中所有例题!
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-3-18 07:29:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用山峰在2003-3-18 0:47:00的发言:

  B&D  "no less than" 不代表语气吧!


谢谢。尽管有保留意见。

以下是引用山峰在2003-3-18 0:47:00的发言:


243  amounts exceed human, 明显比较对象不对等!


其实是在定语从句humans could consume 前省略了比较对象,这应该是很常见的用法吧。
地板
发表于 2003-3-18 11:55:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用xiers在2003-3-18 7:29:00的发言:


其实是在定语从句humans could consume 前省略了比较对象,这应该是很常见的用法吧。



xiers bro,

个人以为,ETS中强调的是语言的严谨;“定语从句前省略了比较对象,这应该是很常见的用法吧”, 有可能。但OG中有这种情况嘛?请举出例子;
同样道理:I think (that) +重句...
省略THAT一般认为没错,但在GMAT中似乎是不可以的;

NO LESS THAN的问题同上。

my 0.02 cents
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-3-18 22:11:00 | 只看该作者
这种例题正是我一直困惑的,正要向大家请教。

30.What was as remarkable as the development of the compact disc has been the use of the new technology to revitalize, (in better sound than was ever before possible), some of the classic recorded performances of the pre-LP era.

105. An inventory equal to 90 days sales is (as much as even the strongest businesses carry), and then only as a way to anticipate higher prices or ensure against shortages.

132. According to a study by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, companies in the United States are providing job training and general education for nearly eight million people, (about equivalent to the enrollment of) the nation's four-year colleges and universities.
(A)    equivalent to the enrollment of
(B)    the equivalent of those enrolled in
(C)    equal to those who are enrolled in
(D)    as many as the enrollment of
(E)    as many as are enrolled in
The comparison in E, the best choice, is logical because people is understood as the subject of are enrolled.
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-3-18 22:16:00 | 只看该作者
还有一道og有直接的评论:
187. In one of the bloodiest battles of the Civil War, fought at Sharpsburg, Maryland, on September 17, 1862, four times as many Americans were killed as would later be killed on the beaches of Normandy during D-Day.
(A)    Americans were killed as
(B)    Americans were killed than
(C)    Americans were killed than those who
(D)    more Americans were killed as there
(E)    more Americans were killed as those who
in C and E, those who is a wordy intrusion.
7#
发表于 2003-3-18 23:17:00 | 只看该作者
xiers bro,

have sth here. hope can make sense.


...,as many people live in suburb as those who live in cities.
A) 必错
B)必错
C)those who live in cities
D) those in cities
E) in cities

C是不对的。首先,当对比的部分在两个AS后指的是相同的人或物,且在第二个AS后面起主语作用时,这个主语一般是要省略的,因为AS本身就替代了主语。(请看OG132,187)。其次,句子中those引导的定语从句是一个名词性结构,只能跟第一个AS后的名词性结构平行,而不能跟第一个AS引导的整个句子平行。所以如果选C的话句子的意思就变成了:

,as many people (as those who live in cities) live in suburb.

这显然是不正确的。同理,D也是不正确的。这个句子可以用两种习惯方式表达:
1,as many people live in suburb as live in cities. Or,
2, as many people live in suburb as in cities.
所以E是正确答案。
平行省略的原则就是在不产生混淆的情况下能省则省。请看例句:
The girl ate as many apples as John.

这句话可以理解成两种意思:
1,The girl ate as many apples as John did.(第二个As后面的主语不能省略因为主语所指不同。一个是“the girl”,一个是“John”。)
2, The girl ate as many apples as (she ate) John.(hehe,她能吃得了几个John呢?第二个AS后面的主语一般也不能省略因为对比的是宾语部分。其实我觉得这里的主语真省了从语法来说也不会产生什么歧义,只不过习惯上不省略。)

但下面的这个例句中恐怕第二个AS后面的主语是要省略的:
On sunday, as many girls went to the movies as went shopping.

My two cents.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 10:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部