prep07 9 逻辑主语怎么不对了？

jianaozhonghua · 发表于 2011-6-18 23:14:56

9.(24979-!-item-!-188;#058&001658)

Based on records from ancient Athens, each year young Athenian women collaborated to

weave a new woolen robe that they used to dress a statue of the goddess Athena and that this robe depicted scenes of a battle between Zeus, Athena's father, and giants.

(A) Based on records from ancient Athens, each year young Athenian women collaborated to weave a new woolen robe that they used to dress

(B) Based on records from ancient Athens, each year young Athenian women had collaborated to weave a new woolen robe with which to dress

(C) According to records from ancient Athens, each year young Athenian women collaborated to weave a new woolen robe that they used to dress

(D) Records from ancient Athens indicate that each year young Athenian women collaborated to weave a new woolen robe with which they dressed

(E) Records from ancient Athens indicate each year young Athenian women had collaborated to weave a new woolen robe for dressing

答案D

ＡＢ号称逻辑主语错误我理解 based on：根绝***记载，女人们早期*** 完全说得通啊

C也说了逻辑主语错误也不理解

其他错误包括 that ** and that 平行； for doing 不如to do 有效；等等。

正确选项D被说成是，没有使用分词句首有效避免逻辑主语问题。也就是说分词居首就是一个犯错概率大的结构？我记得在很多题目中句子中间也出现过分词结构，同样存在逻辑主语问题。所以是不是说只要有分词结构就有逻辑主语问题而不是非要分词居首才有逻辑主语问题？

colasama · 发表于 2011-6-18 23:48:35

首先，根据that ……and that……平行来判断。足以找到答案，只有D是平行的。

然后关于逻辑主语的问题。
不是句首用分词一定有逻辑主语问题，而是要看句首的分词在意思上修饰的是什么东西。

按你的理解“ＡＢ号称逻辑主语错误我理解 based on：根绝***记载，女人们早期*** 完全说得通啊”
句首的分词based on……修饰的是逗号后面的整句话。

而通常来说，句首分词修饰的只是主语
这样理解，AB选项的意思就是“Young Athenian is based on records from ancient Athens.”
这就能看出错误在哪了吧。

colasama · 发表于 2011-6-19 00:04:40

另外，如果说C也是逻辑主语错误的话，就不敢苟同了。

例子：
108. (30307-!-item-!-188;#058&004171)
According to a new report by the surgeon general, women with less than a high school education…………

jianaozhonghua · 发表于 2011-6-19 01:30:25

另外，如果说C也是逻辑主语错误的话，就不敢苟同了。

例子：
108. (30307-!-item-!-188;#058&004171)
According to a new report by the surgeon general, women with less than a high school education…………

-- by 会员 colasama (2011/6/19 0:04:40)

首先，谢谢你的解释based on的问题明白了。

关于according to逻辑主语的问题 prep07上面这么写的(C) young Athenian women作为According to…的逻辑主语,不符合逻辑;未划线部分的and that从语法上跟that they used…平行,共同修饰a new woolen robe,不符合逻辑

我的感觉according to是不是本来就不用考虑逻辑主语问题。according to属于分词结构么？

colasama · 发表于 2011-6-19 02:06:30

嗯，我也看了prep上说according to 逻辑主语不对之类的解释。

但是想想要是according to也要考虑逻辑主语的话，这词组根本没法用了。然后我就搜了下，找到那题108的，证明according to的确不受这个限制

according to属不属于分词结构这个问题问得好~~感性上觉得不是，但的确有accord这个动词
so~~我去查了朗文当代。发现的确不是分词结构。

accord做动词：
1.给予;用法 accord sth. to sb.
2.与……一致;用法 accord with sth

according to 是一个单独词条，不在accord词条下（跟accord还隔了accordance等几个单词）
词性是介词

然后~你懂的

zwhjzwhj · 发表于 2015-3-8 15:56:45

According to 到底需不需要逻辑主语？

本贴相关题目 GMATPrep-2007E1-SC-9 | TN-24-SC-30 (BQVG)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

prep07 9 逻辑主语怎么不对了？

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()