- UID
- 918686
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-8-2
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Technically, "quicksand " is the term for sand that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid`s character.
A.that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid's character
B.that is so saturated with water that it acquires the character of a liquid
C.that is saturated with water enough to acquire liquid characteristics
D.saturated enough with water so as to acquire the character of a liquid
E.saturated with water so much as to acquire a liquid character
答案是B。
其实我纠结的是A选项,网上关于这个选项的解释的内容我都看遍了,要么是从语义上去判断,要么是从so that及so as to的用法的区别上去kill A.
前者我get不到点,后者我能找出反例。
外网最多的讨论是so as to有表示intent的meaning,sand是没有意识的,所以没有办法有acquire这个动作,但是我找到了反例。
The Emperor Augustus ,it appears ,commissioned an idealized sculpture portrait ,the features of which are so unrealistic as to constitute what one scholar calls an artificial face.
这里features就能有意识去constitute吗?
如果我理解错了,麻烦NN们指正,谢谢~
今天查阅了OG20,official的回复是这样的
The matter of degree in this option is introduced with the word so, which is used to indicated that the relevent degree of saturation will be specified with a clause that states a condition——a statement that includes both a subject and a verb——that implies a certain degree of saturation. Lacking a subject, this sentences fails to state a clear condition.
我的疑问是,that so....后面的部分的主语不就是sand吗?为什么说缺主语?
附一个关于这两个词组用法的神贴:
https://forum.chasedream.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=811091&extra=page%3D1&page=1
|
|