求助OG-SC-137一个困惑的问题

四月雪sophie · 发表于 2011-7-29 22:08:45

137. Joachim Raff and Giacomo Meyerbeer are examples of the kind of composer who receives popular acclaim while living, often goes into decline after death, and never regains popularity again.
(A) often goes into decline after death, and never regains popularity again
(B) whose reputation declines after death and never regains its status again
(C) but whose reputation declines after death and never regains its former status
(D) who declines in reputation after death and who never regained popularity again
(E) then has declined in reputation after death and never regained popularity
答案为C
我想问的是B选项，除了没有连接词，且again redundant以外，其余部分和正确选项C是一样的
为什么og 说 B选项the two clauses do not describe the same thing呢？

Vampirese · 发表于 2011-7-29 23:04:59

icemannfc · 发表于 2011-7-29 23:43:56

With BUT, who and whose are parallel, both refer to compose.

Without, whose is ambiguous, bc it may refer to living.

mongmong · 发表于 2011-7-30 21:42:30

With BUT, who and whose are parallel, both refer to compose.

Without, whose is ambiguous, bc it may refer to living.

-- by 会员 icemannfc (2011/7/29 23:43:56)

哦～～

bitieming · 发表于 2011-7-31 08:12:33

觉得关键问题还是在regain again重复吧

四月雪sophie · 发表于 2011-7-31 14:34:09

明白了!谢谢！！！
顺便问一下，我看到有些地方用",who/whose“，请问这种时候的who/whose可以引导非限制性定语从句吗？

笑小笑小蚂蚁 · 发表于 2014-9-25 10:17:08

icemannfc 发表于 2011-7-29 23:43
With BUT, who and whose are parallel, both refer to compose.Without, whose is ambiguous, bc it may r ...

为什么会说living呢。。whose不可以跨词指代吗，，，根据句意也可以指composer啊。。。。

求助OG-SC-137一个困惑的问题

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()