补充材料 1. 83 At the time of the Mexican agrarian revolution, the most radical faction, that of Zapata and his followers, proposed a return to communal ownership of land, to what have been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards. (A)land, to what have been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards (B)land, a form of ownership of the pre-Columbian and respected by the Spaniards (C)land, respected by the Spaniards and a pre-Columbian form of ownership (D)land in which a pre-Columbian form of ownership was respected by the Spaniards (E)land that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards 答案A). B.C.D.E 都不对但有独立主格(to what...) 这种形式吗?
to what-clause与前面的to communal ownership of land并列。大概意思：建议回到communal ownership of land，回到这种原始共产主义的communal ownership状态，这种communal ownership是Spaniards respected的。
这个句子有些怪怪的，我是同意siebel 的意见的 在原话中，"to what have been..." 中的 "what have been 是介词to的宾语从句，整个介词引导的从句，包括介词一起作前面提到的return的并列定语，于前面的return后的to ... 并列，不是独立结构。独立结构中只能是逻辑主语，逻辑谓语，作状语用， 不可能用真正的的谓语。
1stzhang, 想问一下,如果象你所说,，"to what have been..." 中的 "what have been 是介词to的宾语从句，整个介词引导的从句，包括介词一起作前面提到的return的并列定语，于前面的return后的to ... 并列. 那么为什么这里的并列成分不用and连接.
以下是引用wdzc在2003-5-24 12:40:00的发言： 1stzhang, 想问一下,如果象你所说,，"to what have been..." 中的 "what have been 是介词to的宾语从句，整个介词引导的从句，包括介词一起作前面提到的return的并列定语，于前面的return后的to ... 并列. 那么为什么这里的并列成分不用and连接.
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2003-5-23 05:26:00
A). B.C.D.E 都不对但有独立主格(to what...) 这种形式吗?
