ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1823|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD1-Q7求解答~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-9-1 11:01:49 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

A.    that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times
B.    that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times
C.    that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
D.    CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
E.    CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

答案是C

三个问题求NN解答。

1. A是不是错在没有do。应该是that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers do。还有compared to a ratio of 42 times是否有错?

2. C里面的their指代我认为不清啊。可以指代CEO's也可以指代blue-collar workers。

3. CEO's 为什么不用CEOs来表示复数? 是不是因为CEO是简写Chief Executive Officers? 谢谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-9-1 11:40:09 | 只看该作者
A错在逻辑对象比较不对等。CEO's now earn 与 ratio对比,错。
B,道理同A,同时compare要用被动形式。
C,CEO是的单数,workers是复数,所以their只能指代workers,没有歧义。
板凳
发表于 2012-9-3 00:05:00 | 只看该作者
compared to a ratio of 42 times当然有错,应比较同类事物。这道题比的是挣的钱倍数的不同 而且C的effectiveness也更好
地板
发表于 2014-8-15 11:59:39 | 只看该作者
B.    that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times
C.    that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

BC一个明显区别是对比对象不一致
CEO's=CEOs 不然整道题都不对了
compare不能用主动
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-3 00:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部