ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2369|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG13 SC92. 为什么不能用Both求解释

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-7-15 20:47:01 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
92. Thelonious Monk, who was a jazz pianist and composer, produced a body of work both rooted in the stride-piano tradition of Willie (The Lion) Smith and Duke Ellington, yet in many ways he stood apart from the mainstream jazz repertory.
(A)  Thelonious Monk, who was a jazz pianist and composer, produced a body of work both rooted
(B)  Thelonious Monk, the jazz pianist and composer, produced a body of work that was rooted both
(C)  Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk, who produced a body of work rooted
(D)  Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk produced a body of work that was rooted
(E)  Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk produced a body of work rooted both


Correct Answer: D

解释上说The appearance of both is misleading, since only one point is being made about where Monk's musical roots are located.
不理解这是什么意思,为什么only one point is made?

求解释,谢谢!!


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-7-15 21:00:14 | 只看该作者
lz要仔细看看句意。。
句子中说的work仅仅是rooted在stride-piano tradition这一个对象,后面的Willie (The Lion) Smith and Duke Ellington是修饰stride-piano tradition,所以解释才说只有one point,要是用了both...and...的话就把这个整体分割成stride-piano tradition of Willie (The Lion) Smith和Duke Ellington并列了,不合理。。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-7-15 21:03:39 | 只看该作者
苏木苏木 发表于 2013-7-15 21:00
lz要仔细看看句意。。
句子中说的work仅仅是rooted在stride-piano tradition这一个对象,后面的Willie (The ...

对奥。多谢,是我太不仔细了。
地板
发表于 2014-7-17 07:15:27 | 只看该作者
苏木苏木 发表于 2013-7-15 21:00
lz要仔细看看句意。。
句子中说的work仅仅是rooted在stride-piano tradition这一个对象,后面的Willie (The ...

苏木正解,谢谢
5#
发表于 2014-7-17 09:31:51 | 只看该作者
苏木解释的很好,另一方面如果来不及细想句子意思的话可以从结构上解释,一般both...and都是要求结构平行的,前面如果是both rooted in 的话后面也得是and rooted in,而不会直接是个人名
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-11 20:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部