ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5493|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]一个白痴问题: OG 73(C)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-1-11 21:31:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]一个白痴问题: OG 73(C)

73. The British Admiralty and the War Office met in March 1892 to consider a possible Russian attempt to seize
Constantinople and how they would have to act militarily to deal with them.
(A) how they would have to act militarily to deal with them
(B) how to deal with them if military action would be necessary
(C) what would be necessary militarily for dealing with such an event
(D) what military action would be necessary in order to deal with such an event
(E) the necessity of what kind of military action in order to take for dealing with it
In choices A and B, the pronoun them has no antecedent; furthermore, the (/clause in B must take should ratherthan would. In C, necessary militarily is awkward and vague. E is wordy and garbles the meaning withincorrect word order. Choice D is best: its phrasing is clear, grammatical, and idiomatic. Moreover, D is the choice that most closely parallels the construction of the nonunderlined portion of the sentence. The sentencestates that the Admiralty and the War Office met to consider x and y, where x is the noun phrase a possible
Russian attempt. D provides a noun phrase, military action, that matches the structure of x more closely than do the corresponding noun elements in the other choices.

选D没有问题!
我的问题是:为什么C不行呀?
自己感觉C就是不对,因为necessary的修饰位置发生了变动,但怎么也说不出理由来?
而OG的解释看不明白?
那里awkward and vague了?

还请多多指教!

多谢!
沙发
发表于 2004-1-11 22:15:00 | 只看该作者
关键不是necessary ,而是militarily   这一副词形式与necessary的组合。
注意D用的是military 这一名词形式。
2.d 用的是what 引导的名词从句和 a possible Russian attempt 这一名词短语对应。
个人之见,指教。
板凳
发表于 2004-1-11 22:43:00 | 只看该作者
同意qww GG 的意见。如果真要考虑C, 一般也是 it is +(adj) + to do sth, or it is +(adj)+ for doing sth. 而不是副词。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-1-11 23:34:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用qww在2004-1-11 22:15:00的发言:
关键不是necessary ,而是militarily   这一副词形式与necessary的组合。
注意D用的是military 这一名词形式。
2.d 用的是what 引导的名词从句和 a possible Russian attempt 这一名词短语对应。
个人之见,指教。


多谢qww GG 和dansy ppmm!

我真是发晕了~~~~

OG越看越不明白,越看越糊涂呀!!

郁闷ing!


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-1-11 23:51:18编辑过]
5#
发表于 2004-3-8 17:54:00 | 只看该作者

(C)    what    would    be    necessary    militarily    for    dealing    with    such    an    event如果改成what    would    be    militarily    necessary    for    dealing    with    such    an    event可能会好一点。fficeffice" />


例如:She is uncommonly pretty. 方式副词修饰形容词,副词必须前置。She is pretty to an uncommon degree. 方式副词短语修饰形容词,副词后置。

6#
发表于 2004-6-3 11:55:00 | 只看该作者
In choices A and B, the pronoun them has no antecedent; furthermore, the (/clause in B must take should ratherthan would.

答案是D,我没有问题。og解释中我不明白为什么要说would在这里不如should,是虚拟语气的缘故吗?感觉should解释为“应当”放在这里倒不如would更舒服。

请指教~~bow

7#
发表于 2004-6-3 12:16:00 | 只看该作者
if 后面不能用would ,主将从现;但是should可以用,记得以前大全里几道题考过
8#
发表于 2004-6-3 13:10:00 | 只看该作者
“主将从现”是说主句是将来时,从句用现在时?也就是说这里if是引导虚拟语气了。还不是特别明白。
9#
发表于 2005-7-22 14:12:00 | 只看该作者

对比五个选项,发现其余四个有act或action,而C中


what would be necessary militarily for dealing with such an event


只有necessary militarily。


这个what necessary是action呢,还是其他的思想?方针?政策?


所以单单少了这个action这点,就变得awkward and vague了。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 19:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部