ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2774|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og152

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-3-1 14:16:00 | 只看该作者

og152

152. When the technique known as gene-splicing was invented in the early 1970's, it was feared that scien­tists might inadvertently create an "Andromeda strain," a microbe never before seen on Earth that might escape from the laboratory and it would kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it.


(A)  it would kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it


(B)   it might kill vast numbers of humans with no natural defenses against it


(C)  kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it(虚拟语气没有错)


(D)  kill vast numbers of humans who have no natu­ral defenses against them


(E)   kill vast numbers of humans with no natural defenses against them



请问:DE除了them使用错误以外还有别的错误吗?D中who引导的是限制型定语从句还是非限制性定语从句?


E改成kill vast numbers of humans with no natural defenses against it对吗?

沙发
发表于 2005-3-1 15:38:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得E这样改不好,因为 with是伴随状况,这里应该是修饰humans的,应该用从句比较好。

D 中还有是have 的错误,应该用would have 因为前面是might,全句都是过去时态

板凳
发表于 2005-11-16 15:40:00 | 只看该作者

偶有一个问题,不考虑would的因素,请问with引导的修饰结构和who引导的修饰结构有什么区别么?谢谢

地板
发表于 2006-12-30 10:04:00 | 只看该作者
同问!
5#
发表于 2007-1-11 09:41:00 | 只看该作者

我想最主要的区别应该就是如OG141中的那样,在whose前有逗号的时候作非限定修饰

如果紧随主体词,同时作定语的话,觉得区别不大,应该通过其他条件排除

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 13:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部