关于分词的修饰问题真的是困扰好久。。。
楼主是这样理解的但不知道对不对，求指正：
分词（包括v-ing和v-ed，以下简称分词）在“，分词”结构中，可能有3种修饰：
1.修饰就近的名词或名词短语
2.修饰主句主语
3.修饰前面一整句话
当分词在逻辑上只能用于修饰以上3种情况之一时，则不存在歧义，否则必错。。。
遇到好多分词修饰的问题额。。。
比如一道过去分词的题目（虽然不是此题的重要考点）
1. Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utiility vehicles, cost less, get better gas mileage, allow passengers to get in and out more easily, and have a smoother ride.
A.Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utiility vehicles, cost less,
B.Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, they cost less
C.Minivans carry as many as seven passengers, in comparison with most sport utility vehicles,and have a lower cost ,they
D.Minivans, carrying as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,
E.Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compareed with most sport utility vehicles the cost is loewer, and they
OA: A
对答案没什么质疑，只是元叔在写解释的时候说B,D中的compared会有修饰passengers的错误，但是从逻辑上来讲passengers怎么能和vehicles相比呢，所以我认为此处不会造成此错误。。。however, open to discuss
再比如：
2.In Greek theology the supreme being was Esaugetu Emissee(Master of Breath), who dwelt in an upper realm in which the sky was the floor, and who had the power to give and to take away the breadth of life.
A. in which the sky was floor, and who had the power to give and to take
B. where the sky was the floor, having the power to give and to take
C.whose floor was the sky, and who has the power of giving and of taking
D. in which the sky was the floor, with the power of giving and taking
E. whose floor was the sky, having the power to give and take
OA: A
元叔给的解答是B和E, having...优先修饰the sky was the floor（表示不理解）？？？
还有关于with的问题，是不是从逻辑上判断当有且只有一个n能被with结构附属，且该名词恰好是with要附属的那个n时，with的用法就不存在问题（处理其他语法错误外，仅谈修饰）
file:///C:\Users\admin\AppData\Roaming\Tencent\Users\532341453\QQ\WinTemp\RichOle\}O~}6FZ5%BQ~K0(AS2(A4I3.jpg
看到CD上有人总结v-ing的作用如下：
逗号与V-ing搭配出现在句尾时的规则：a） V-ing修饰名词时，只能修饰主句主语，主句的谓语必须是Be； b） V-ing表示伴随状语时，其逻辑主语必是主句主语，即主语主语能够发出V-ing的动作，且V-ing动作发生在主句动作发生的过程内； c） V-ing表示结果状语时，其没有单纯的逻辑主语，造成V-ing动作的原因是整个主句主谓描述的内容； 4·如果一个V-ing不能起到上述的3个作用中的任何一个的话，那么这个V应该是以谓语的形式出现；
但是！！楼主有的时候会看到的有的解释里说,ving有修饰就近名词的歧义，就想第一题的解释中compared一样。。。所以到底是怎么样！！！
好多疑问。。。
不知分词的修饰是不是这样，求赐教！
跪求！！！！ 跪求大神解释
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2014-3-24 19:43:34
收藏
收藏
