- UID
- 850481
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-1-20
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
66. In a plan to stop the erosion of East Coast beaches, the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that would rise six feet above the waterline and act as a buffer, so that it absorbs the energy of crashing waves and protecting the beaches.
(A) act as a buffer, so that it absorbs
(B) act like a buffer so as to absorb
(C) act as a buffer, absorbing
(D) acting as a buffer, absorbing
(E) acting like a buffer, absorb
OG explanation:
The last part of the sentence describes the breakwater and should consist of two grammatically parallel phrases, absorbing... and protecting, in order to show two equal functions.
我的疑问在这里,首先分析这里的句子, that前面是完整的主谓结构,that 开始就是一个修饰这个breakwater的定语从句。
这里的ing and ing 放在了句末.
我疑惑的是这里ing,到底是做 that 从句内的一个状语,还是整个句子的状语。
>>>>从这个题看来,ing 做的是that从句里面句子的状语。
但是当我刷到千行笔记:Og 12,144题时。
116. The original building and loan associations were organized as limited life funds, whose members made monthly payments on their share subscriptions, then taking turns drawing on the funds for home mortgages.
(A) subscriptions, then taking turns drawing
(B) subscriptions, and then taking turns drawing
(C) subscriptions and then took turns drawing
(D) subscriptions and then took turns, they drew
(E) subscriptions and then drew, taking turns
笔记讲到A选项: 如果是ing形式作伴随状语的结构,ing形式都somehow modifies the whole sentence,其逻辑主语就是原句子的主语。
所以如果句子写成taking那个样,他的主语就是association,但这从句意和逻辑上不make sense
与我的想法冲突,有没有同学也有这样的疑惑,恳请牛牛帮忙解惑。
|
|