ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4270|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] 求解OG16 SC第61题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-1-26 20:26:27 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
原题如下:
To develop more accurate population forecasts,demographers have to know a great deal more than now about the social and economic determinants of fertility.

答案中说这个时态要用would have to know,想不太通....

求各位大神解答 蟹蟹~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2016-1-29 18:28:18 | 只看该作者
为什么没人TAT 桑心~~~
板凳
发表于 2016-1-30 23:31:20 | 只看该作者
我觉得前面说了to develop,所以主句就要用将来时就用will,这里可能有点虚拟语态的感觉,所以用would。不知道这样解释对不对
地板
发表于 2016-5-30 14:41:19 | 只看该作者
个人觉得此题不一定必然使用虚拟语气,不过A项的比较结构不正确,另外考察用词economic and economical。综合选择D:would have to know a great deal more than they do now about the social and economic
5#
发表于 2017-11-5 18:12:19 | 只看该作者
楼主楼主!我在Manhattan Prep的forum里找到了Ron大神的回复:
either "have to..." or "would have to..." (or "will have to...", which doesn't appear in the choices) could work here.

"have to ..."
--> no implication about whether this is likely; just a matter-of-fact statement about what they need.
"would have to..."
--> implies that this is an unlikely (or even impossible) scenario.
"will have to..."
--> implies that this will be at issue sometime in the future. doesn't imply anything about whether demographers will be able to achieve this kind of knowledge, but says that they'll need it (and so will fail in their efforts if they don't succeed in obtaining the knowledge).

if you change "economical" to "economic" in choice (b), you would have another viable option.
出处:https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/forecast-t7862-15.html

也就是说这道题里的have to/would have to不是一个真正的split,这两种表达意思上有轻微的不同,但是这里我们无法判断原意是哪个,所以两个都行。事实上这道题确实不需要用这个来判断出正确选项
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 11:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部