ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1524|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全919(og030)没人问过

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-9-3 23:02:00 | 只看该作者

大全919(og030)没人问过

 30. What was as remarkable as the development of the compact disc has been the use of the new technology to revitalize, in better sound than was ever before possible, some of the classic recorded performances of the pre-LP era.

(A)  What was as remarkable as the development of the compact disc

(B)   The thing that was as remarkable as developing the compact disc

(C)  No less remarkable than the development of the compact disc

(D)  Developing the compact disc has been none the less
                                        remarkable than

(E)   Development of the compact disc has been no less
                                        remarkable as

Besides being wordy, the clauses beginning What was in A and The thing that was in B cause inconsistencies in verb tense: the use of the new technology cannot logically be described by both the present perfect has been and the past was.
                                    

不理解为什么两个时态要一致,一个是development比较一个是new technology ,是两个不同的事物

C选项 是不是省略了that。感觉划线部分应该是个名词性从句作主语

(A)  What was as remarkable as the development of the compact disc

(B)   The thing that was as remarkable as developing the compact disc

(C)  No less remarkable than the development of the compact disc

(D)  Developing the compact disc has been none the less
            remarkable than

(E)   Development of the compact disc has been no less
            remarkable as

Besides being wordy, the clauses beginning What was in A and The thing that was in B cause inconsistencies in verb tense: the use of the new technology cannot logically be described by both the present perfect has been and the past was.
        

不理解为什么两个时态要一致,一个是development比较一个是new technology ,是两个不同的事物

C选项 是不是省略了that。感觉划线部分应该是个名词性从句作主语

沙发
发表于 2006-9-3 23:33:00 | 只看该作者
n
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-9-4 08:41:00 | 只看该作者
不好意思 操作失误后半段重复了 但是意思能明白吧 请nn指教一下
地板
发表于 2006-9-7 21:22:00 | 只看该作者

that 作为连词不能随意省略,是指同位语从句和宾语从句中~

貌似没有提到讲名词性从句哎~~~

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-9-7 22:55:00 | 只看该作者

Besides being wordy, the clauses beginning What was in A and The thing that was in B cause inconsistencies in verb tense: the use of the new technology cannot logically be described by both the present perfect has been and the past was.
        

对于og的解释 不理解为什么两个时态要一致,一个是development比较一个是new technology ,是两个不同的事物

还是不明白为什么A错

6#
发表于 2006-9-7 23:42:00 | 只看该作者

The wordy expressions in a and b all convey that the subject of the initial subordinate clause beginning with either what or that is the use of the new technology.So the two verb tenses must be consistent.

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-9-20 11:53:00 | 只看该作者

主语从句必须和主句时态一直吗 有没有什么例子

8#
发表于 2006-10-22 12:20:00 | 只看该作者
A 得正常语序是 
the use of the new technology  has been What was as remarkable as the development of the compact disc 
你这么看就发现了 时态得矛盾
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-21 05:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部