ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strong regenerative ability, and if one arm is lost it quickly replaces it. sometimes by the animal overcompensating and growing an extra one or two.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3480|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG13 114 求解释,万谢

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-10-27 10:58:16 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strong regenerative ability, and if one arm is lost it quickly replaces it, sometimes by the animal overcompensating and growing an extra one or two.

(A) one arm is lost it quickly replaces it, sometimes by the animal overcompensating and

(B) one arm is lost it is quickly replaced, with the animal sometimes overcompensating and

(C) they lose one arm they quickly replace it, sometimes by the animal overcompensating,

(D) they lose one arm they are quickly replaced, with the animal sometimes overcompensating,

(E) they lose one arm it is quickly replaced, sometimes with the animal overcompensating,

答案是B,我选的C

前半句B的主语是one arm, C的是they(starfish)和and前面的句子主语一致,不应该更合理吗?(虽然两个都没错)
然后后半句就更不明白了,C我理解的是by overcompensating 这种方式来replace arm, 然后逗号后面growing...是来解释overcompensating是什么样的方法的。。。
我的想法错在哪?
谢谢大家的解答
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-10-27 12:28:10 | 只看该作者
提供一个GMATCLUB上的解释
use of by is improper in an active voice setting. It should be with the animal rather than by the animal; overcompensating, growing is improper co-ordination. There should be an and in between
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-10-27 15:57:12 | 只看该作者
guaiss 发表于 2013-10-27 12:28
提供一个GMATCLUB上的解释
use of by is improper in an active voice setting. It should be with the ani ...

为什么主动语态用by就improper了?
地板
发表于 2013-10-27 18:52:43 | 只看该作者
fzxfff 发表于 2013-10-27 15:57
为什么主动语态用by就improper了?

lz,这里有一个很重要的知识点:
逗号+Ving 形式在用的时候时候有条件,即这个动作必须与前面的句子有绝对的逻辑关系。
5#
发表于 2013-10-27 19:02:45 | 只看该作者
来自ron 关于comma+Ving 用法的详细解释:楼主请戳下面。。。

所以读完后你会发现:这种用法不能用来表示解释说明。!!这也是以前我们自己写作文的时候经常会犯的并觉得是对的错误= =

逗号+VING 1表伴随,同时发生;2表结果;没有第三了!

"* 关于comma+Ving的补充(详细版):
the ""comma + ing"" modifier should only be used when:
(A)【跟主语的关系,逻辑主语必须一致】不一定是主句主语
it MODIFIES THE ENTIRE ACTION of the preceding clause, and it APPLIES TO THE SUBJECT of that clause;【修饰整个之前的句子,逻辑主语必须是句子的主语】

AND

(B)【跟 main action 的关系--时间上同时从属,或者 关系上 从属】
one of the following is true:

(1) the ""ing"" action is SIMULTANEOUS with, and SUBORDINATE to, the main action;
- i ran down the sidewalk, flapping my arms wildly
(2) the ""ing"" action is a DIRECT AND IMMEDIATE CONSEQUENCE of the main action.
- i got a 100 on the most recent exam, bringing my average up to 91

since COMMA + -ING clauses are automatically attributed to the SUBJECT of the preceding clause, this modifies the moon.
as it clearly should, in context.

also note that it applies not only to that subject, but to the entire action of that clause (this is what makes it ""adverbial"")."
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-10-27 20:57:14 | 只看该作者
zhudanqing 发表于 2013-10-27 19:02
来自ron 关于comma+Ving 用法的详细解释:楼主请戳下面。。。

所以读完后你会发现:这种用法不能用来表示 ...

十分感谢~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 15:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部