此为og198题
og解释如下：
If than is followed by a clause referring to army, the subject of that clause must be singular (it). Furthermore, the verb of that clause will need to be in the past perfect form (had had) because it refers to a time before the simple past of entered. Finally, the preposition for is more precise than in because supplies are gathered for an upcoming campaign. Choices A and C incorrectly use the plural they and the simple past had. Moreover, A uses the less precise in. Choices D and E wisely dispense with the full clause and use a simple prepositional phrase. D, however, uses the imprecise in and the plural their. Only E, the best choice, avoids all the errors mentioned above.
已经很清楚了
Although Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than for any previous campaign, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.
如果改为
Although Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than（the supplies） it had had for any previous campaign, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.正确么？根据OG的解释应该是正确的。今晚被比较弄晕了！！！
比较中可以省略主语，这个是确定的。省略宾语应该更可以接受吧（疑惑中~~~）
在疑问句中any后是绝对可以接pl.名词的，肯定句中应该可以，不确定。
敬请指正！
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-2-6 0:08:20编辑过] | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2004-1-25 14:04:00
