ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The fact of some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely they vary considerably on a spectrum of genetic relatedness.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2328|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] GWD-6-Q31

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-7-1 00:51:54 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The fact of some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely they vary considerably on a spectrum of genetic relatedness.
A.     The fact of some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely they vary considerably
B.     That some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly while others look quite dissimilar highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely that they vary considerably
C.     With some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar, it highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely considerable variation
D.     With some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar, it is a fact that highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely a considerable variation        (B)
E.     Because some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly and others look quite dissimilar, this fact highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely they vary considerably

PREP笔记上说,C和D中with独立主格的逻辑主语错误,这是什么意思?没明白。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-7-12 21:40:53 | 只看该作者
hi,peby~
关于with引导独立主格的用法,我之前看其他帖子里讨论说好像是不需要逻辑主语的,manhattan上也没查到...

帮顶吧~

BTW,还想问一下PREP上说D选项中a fact没指代该怎么理解啊?
谢谢咯~
板凳
发表于 2013-7-12 22:52:30 | 只看该作者
我觉得这题里的with 逻辑主语有问题就是with 一般表伴随是伴随主句的主语和谓语动词发生的。C,D中with 都伴随主句的it 这个动作发生。it指什么都不清楚自然逻辑主语有问题。楼下说fact没指代。一般出现fact这个抽象名词前面会有一个事实让fact指代,可是前面是个伴随状语啊。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 11:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部