关于SVO，ving修饰的一个小问题

扣肉儿 · 发表于 2013-6-8 11:04:48

在SVO，ving结构中，如果谓语含有情态动词，后面可以用ving修饰么？是不是根本就没有这种用法？
例如：OG 13-115 的C选项
Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tinv islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, thev have already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands.

(A) Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated
(B) Because the new maritime code provides that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, it has already stimulated
(C) Even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, already stimulating
(D) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, this has already stimulated
(E) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, which is already stimulating

bejamin1111 · 发表于 2013-6-8 11:52:45

不是情态动词的原因，这里这个错误是因为句子逻辑关系和合理重心的改变

扣肉儿 · 发表于 2013-6-8 21:36:58

bejamin1111 发表于 2013-6-8 11:52
不是情态动词的原因，这里这个错误是因为句子逻辑关系和合理重心的改变
...

嗯这个我知道的，只是想问问ving是不是不能修饰情态动词，如果不能，C就可以很快的被排除了。
可以么？

bejamin1111 · 发表于 2013-6-8 22:34:30

扣肉儿发表于 2013-6-8 21:36
嗯这个我知道的，只是想问问ving是不是不能修饰情态动词，如果不能，C就可以很快的被排除了。
可以么？ ...

情态动词一定后面跟了实义动词哇，情态动词又没有实际的意义。。。

扣肉儿 · 发表于 2013-6-10 17:14:54

bejamin1111 发表于 2013-6-8 22:34
情态动词一定后面跟了实义动词哇，情态动词又没有实际的意义。。。

但是情态动词比如must是表示一种可能性的，ving应该不可以作为adv modifier修饰“一定会坐某事”吧？

本贴相关题目 OG-2017-SC-781 | GMATPrep-2008E2-SC-163OG-2017-SC-781 |
OG-2016-SC-115 |
OG-2015-SC-115 |
OG-13-SC-115 |
OG-12-SC-113 |
GMATPrep-2008E2-SC-163
... (ZYBS)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

[SC总结] 关于SVO，ving修饰的一个小问题

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()