ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Heating-oil prices are expected to be higher this year than last because refiners are paying about $5 a barrel more for crude oil than they were last year.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3294|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12 93

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-11-30 16:28:41 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Heating-oil prices are expected to be higher this year than last because refiners are paving about S5 a barrel more for crude oil than thev were last year.
(A)Heating-oil prices are expected to be higher this year than last because refiners are paying about $5 a barrel more for crude oil than they were
(B)Heating-oil prices are expected to rise higher this year over last because refiners pay about $5 a barrel for crude oil more than they did
(C)Expectations are for heating-oil prices to be higher this year than last year's because refiners are paying about $5 a barrel for crude oil more than they did
(D)It is the expectation that heating-oil prices will be higher for this year over last because refiners are paying about $5 a barrel more for crude oil now than what they were
(E)It is expected that heating-oil prices will rise higher this year than last year's because refiners pay about $5 a barrel for crude oil more than they did

想问一下more than的用法
刚查了一下DUKB的千行excel上面对more than的解释如下
The words more and less are rather flexible.They can be used us nouns(or pronouns),adjectives,or adverbs.

Right:I own MORE THAN I should(noun or pronoun)
Right:I own MORE SHIRTS THAN Ishould.(adjective)
Right:I sleep MORE THAN I should.(adverb)

把E选项拿出来分析看看歧义在哪里:
refiners pay about $5 a barrel for crude oil more than they did.
当more做形容词时:
crude oil (more than)they did:他们去年支付的油钱比5美元还要少
当more 做副词时:
crude oil (more)than they did:比去年支付的油钱多付了5美元(intended meaning)


我想问的是
当more做形容词时:
crude oil (more than)they did:他们去年支付的油钱比5美元还要少。
这里的more than 修饰的是$5 a barrel么?
这句话的翻译怎么感觉很奇怪呢?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-11-30 21:13:47 | 只看该作者
$5 a barrel修饰more than~
没记错的话这里aeo斑斑的比较总结里也出现过一点错误,我专门查过语法书:
修饰more...than结构的可以是far,even,many,a lot,three times等,也可以是有表示度量概念的名词词组表示,如Peter is two inches taller than John~
板凳
发表于 2012-12-2 20:04:57 | 只看该作者
$5 a barrel修饰more than~
没记错的话这里aeo斑斑的比较总结里也出现过一点错误,我专门查过语法书:
修饰more...than结构的可以是far,even,many,a lot,three times等,也可以是有表示度量概念的名词词组表示,如Peter is two inches taller than John~
-- by 会员 yiqing2012 (2012/11/30 21:13:47)


没搞懂你的意思噶
地板
发表于 2012-12-2 20:11:15 | 只看该作者
$5 a barrel修饰more than~
没记错的话这里aeo斑斑的比较总结里也出现过一点错误,我专门查过语法书:
修饰more...than结构的可以是far,even,many,a lot,three times等,也可以是有表示度量概念的名词词组表示,如Peter is two inches taller than John~
-- by 会员 yiqing2012 (2012/11/30 21:13:47)


亲。。。。。。我记得manhattan里讲过N times只有和as...as...来标示多倍数的表达,而N times +more than这种比较级是错误的,要不咱再查查???
5#
发表于 2012-12-2 20:28:43 | 只看该作者
$5 a barrel修饰more than~
没记错的话这里aeo斑斑的比较总结里也出现过一点错误,我专门查过语法书:
修饰more...than结构的可以是far,even,many,a lot,three times等,也可以是有表示度量概念的名词词组表示,如Peter is two inches taller than John~
-- by 会员 yiqing2012 (2012/11/30 21:13:47)



亲。。。。。。我记得manhattan里讲过N times只有和as...as...来标示多倍数的表达,而N times +more than这种比较级是错误的,要不咱再查查???
-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2012/12/2 20:11:15)



MGMAT在講multiplication的時候提到,n + times adjective-比較級 + than : 表示n+1倍^^
6#
发表于 2012-12-2 22:11:42 | 只看该作者
这个问题很纠结,LZ不放把more当做一般的形容词使用,不要随便改变形容词或者副词的位置,该修饰谁就修饰谁。。。

N times +more than结构,虽然Manhattan说它是错的,但是Prep和GWD里面有时候会作为正确答案使用,所以还是不要把这个作为优先标准了。
7#
发表于 2012-12-3 17:30:13 | 只看该作者
$5 a barrel修饰more than~
没记错的话这里aeo斑斑的比较总结里也出现过一点错误,我专门查过语法书:
修饰more...than结构的可以是far,even,many,a lot,three times等,也可以是有表示度量概念的名词词组表示,如Peter is two inches taller than John~
-- by 会员 yiqing2012 (2012/11/30 21:13:47)



亲。。。。。。我记得manhattan里讲过N times只有和as...as...来标示多倍数的表达,而N times +more than这种比较级是错误的,要不咱再查查???
-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2012/12/2 20:11:15)

这个我很确定,因为我当时把语法书这章看了好多遍。。。
回去我截图发一下~
8#
发表于 2012-12-3 21:54:24 | 只看该作者
粘在附件里了 应该可以显示的吧~~

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
9#
发表于 2012-12-3 22:45:30 | 只看该作者
yiqing你那个是哪里的资料呀
10#
发表于 2012-12-3 22:52:48 | 只看该作者
我找老师问了也说是可以用,但是manhattan上倒是确实写了不行,而且manhattan还举例了:说verbal有道正确答案的写法是:....."5 times greater than".....的用法实际上是错误的,in general,this usage should be avoided=======

我看还是不要当做绝对错误删除选项就得了,如果原文是N times AS...as...,那下面的选项不要变成N times more than就可以了......
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 03:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部