ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1857|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请问下prep里面讲的rules, laws, agreements后面介绍的法规内容需要用V-ing怎么理解?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-10-24 21:12:32 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
请问下prep里面讲的rules, laws, agreements后面介绍的法规内容需要用V-ing怎么理解?我看了好几个句子, 这一条不成立,怎么正确理解这个语法点呢?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-24 21:12:52 | 只看该作者
从别的帖子上找来的一个例子
74. A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States

reduced the amountof phosphates
that municipalities had been allowed todump into the Great Lakes.

(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalitieshad been allowed to dump

(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalitieshad been dumping

(C) reduces the phosphate amountmunicipalities have been allowed to dump

(D) reducedthe amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump

(E) reduces the amount of phosphatesallowed for dumping by municipalities
板凳
发表于 2012-10-24 22:09:54 | 只看该作者
quote:

"laws to require..." isn't a correct idiom if you're discussing the actual text of the laws themselves.


if you were discussing the ultimate purpose of those laws, then this could be idiomatic.




examples:
laws specifying long jail sentences for drunk drivers --> correct (___ing), since that's what the laws actually specify.


laws to specify long jail sentences for drunk drivers --> incorrect (that's not the ultimate purpose of the laws)


laws to discourage drunk driving --> correct (this IS actually the ultimate purpose of the laws)
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-24 22:37:01 | 只看该作者
Got it, thanks!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-16 15:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部