ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1646|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

旧题新解:大全675

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-1 16:13:00 | 只看该作者

旧题新解:大全675

Studies
                show that young people with higher-than-average blood pressure and their families have a history of high blood pressure
                are more likely than others to develop a severe form of the condition.

(A) and their families have a history of high blood pressure

(B) whose families have a history of high blood pressure

(C) and a history of high blood pressure runs in the family

(D) whose families have a history of high blood pressure running in themB

(E) with a history of high blood pressure running in their family

大家以前都是从修饰方面来解答这道题目的,我想从句子结构来分析一下

在A中,and their families have a history of high blood pressure是和higher-than-average blood pressure 平行,修饰yongman 的,但是这里应该用短语或分句,而不是直接用句子,have和后面的are有冲突。这样也可以排除C ,runs in the family 这种表达方式不符合ETS的习惯,我好像也读不顺口,但是不知道具体的语法点是错在那里,还望大家一起讨论。

沙发
发表于 2006-7-21 16:41:00 | 只看该作者

俺知要選(B),簡潔,

但不懂(B)與(D)句意上有何差別?

(加了 running in them 後)

板凳
发表于 2006-7-24 12:17:00 | 只看该作者

个人感觉是为了避免with短语修饰歧义提前了,同时提醒大家介词短语修饰一定要紧跟被修饰对象,儿从句修饰可以跳跃修饰。原序为:

young people whose families have a history of high blood pressure with higher-than-average blood pressure are more likely than others to develop a severe form of the condition

同意双重修饰。

注意those指代young people  with higher-than-average blood pressure ,比较的是有家族史的~~比没家族史的~~更容易develop a severe form
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-25 14:30:20编辑过]
地板
发表于 2006-9-27 22:08:00 | 只看该作者
介宾短语后接定从修饰介宾的修饰语是否会造成歧异?毕竟whose也能修饰物。。。。。。
5#
发表于 2009-7-29 10:20:00 | 只看该作者
up
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 08:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部