Along with the drop in producer prices announced yesterday, the strong retail sales figures released today seem like it is indicative that the economy, although growing slowly, is not nearing a recession.
33. Because an oversupply of computer chips has sent prices plunging, the manufacturer has announced that it will cut production by closing its factories for two days a month. (A) Because an oversupply of computer chips has sent prices plunging, (B) Because of plunging prices for computer chips, which is due to an oversupply, (C) Because computer chip prices have been sent plunging, which resulted from an oversupply (D) Due to plunging computer chip prices from an oversupply, (E) Due to an oversupply, with the result that computer chip prices have been sent plunging, 其中我不能理解的是答案里面对于D的解释,我觉得D里面的因果关系也很清楚啊,求解D的分析。。谢谢!还有就是
35. Along with the drop in producer prices announced yesterday, the strong retail sales figures released today seem like it is indicative that the economy, although growing slowly, is not nearing a recession. (A) like it is indicative that (B) as if to indicate (C) to indicate that (D) indicative of (E) like an indication of Grammatical construction; Agreement In this sentence, the verb seem should be followed by an infi nitive, to indicate; the relative pronoun that correctly introduces the clause, but it does not agree with sales fi gures. A Singular it does not agree with plural sales fi gures. B Verb seem may be followed by as if in some contexts, but here the result is an ungrammatical and illogical construction. C Correct. In this sentence, the verb seem is correctly followed by the infi nitive to indicate, and the pronoun that correctly introduces a clause. D Indicative of cannot introduce a clause. E An indication of is wordy and cannot introduce a clause. 其中B选项的解释不大明白 不知道as if为什么不能用。谢谢啦~
33题:(D) Due to plunging computer chip prices from an oversupply, 只说了是个oversupply,没有说是什么的oversupply,总不能食物供应过多也能导致chip价格下降吧。再有,没有说清楚oversupply和plunging price的关系,应该是oversupply直接导致的价格下降,但是from用的非常的宽泛,只说了从oversupply中出现这个一个现象,并不能说明oversupply就是那个原因。所以从严谨性角度看,不如A。其次due to 开头一直不被GMAT所喜好,能用because开头的句子表达清楚意思的,就不要再用各种动名词修饰词的短语了。毕竟GMAT规则里,直接用动词优于形容词啊。
33题:(D) Due to plunging computer chip prices from an oversupply, 只说了是个oversupply,没有说是什么的oversupply,总不能食物供应过多也能导致chip价格下降吧。再有,没有说清楚oversupply和plunging price的关系,应该是oversupply直接导致的价格下降,但是from用的非常的宽泛,只说了从oversupply中出现这个一个现象,并不能说明oversupply就是那个原因。所以从严谨性角度看,不如A。其次due to 开头一直不被GMAT所喜好,能用because开头的句子表达清楚意思的,就不要再用各种动名词修饰词的短语了。毕竟GMAT规则里,直接用动词优于形容词啊。
33题:(D) Due to plunging computer chip prices from an oversupply, 只说了是个oversupply,没有说是什么的oversupply,总不能食物供应过多也能导致chip价格下降吧。再有,没有说清楚oversupply和plunging price的关系,应该是oversupply直接导致的价格下降,但是from用的非常的宽泛,只说了从oversupply中出现这个一个现象,并不能说明oversupply就是那个原因。所以从严谨性角度看,不如A。其次due to 开头一直不被GMAT所喜好,能用because开头的句子表达清楚意思的,就不要再用各种动名词修饰词的短语了。毕竟GMAT规则里,直接用动词优于形容词啊。
33题:(D) Due to plunging computer chip prices from an oversupply, 只说了是个oversupply,没有说是什么的oversupply,总不能食物供应过多也能导致chip价格下降吧。再有,没有说清楚oversupply和plunging price的关系,应该是oversupply直接导致的价格下降,但是from用的非常的宽泛,只说了从oversupply中出现这个一个现象,并不能说明oversupply就是那个原因。所以从严谨性角度看,不如A。其次due to 开头一直不被GMAT所喜好,能用because开头的句子表达清楚意思的,就不要再用各种动名词修饰词的短语了。毕竟GMAT规则里,直接用动词优于形容词啊。
另外,如果真要用D的话,Due to 后面应该跟真正的原因(oversupply),而不是due to plunging prices。他先说due to plunging proces 再说from oversupply,不清楚啊,人家看完会很confuse.所以不对不对不对~reject!!!
35题,as if to indicate,这是语法错误,不makes sense. E里面,an indication的话也是可以,但是应该是an indication that..而不是of...另外,indicate是动词,动词的表达力是最强的,如果你说an indication变成名词了,就没有这么强了。在SC中,表达意思清楚明确强烈,应该考虑动词先。