ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2352|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]大全25,我的问题无人问

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-10-17 08:06:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]大全25,我的问题无人问

1.        A recent study of ancient clay deposits has provided new evidence supporting the theory of global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact that contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs and many other creatures some 65 million years ago.


(A) supporting the theory of global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact that


(B) supporting the theory that global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact


(C) that supports the theory of global forest fires that were ignited by a meteorite impact and that


(D) in support of the theory that global forest fires were ignited by a meteorite impact and thatB


(E) of support for the theory of a meteorite impact that ignited global forest fires a


答案为B,我的问题是B是否应为


supporting the theory that global forest fires were ignited by a meteorite impact,因为后面by a meteorite impact明显提示要用被动语态


沙发
发表于 2004-10-17 08:27:00 | 只看该作者

这个were不可以加,因为ignited by a meteorite impact是去过分词做后置定语修饰global forest fires的,而该that从句的谓语是contributed to。

如果加上were,那么该从句就有两个谓语了。

板凳
发表于 2004-10-17 11:22:00 | 只看该作者

重要的是谁修饰谁,弄清逻辑关系即可:

supporting 修饰evidence, the theory后面的that为同位语修饰;

ignited作分词修饰fire,contribute为that从句的谓语;

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-17 22:05:00 | 只看该作者
我明白了!多些LES 和OasisWater指点!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-26 20:35
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部