- UID
- 766073
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-6-2
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
昨天看见晨依的模板,就用了一下,结果还没写最后一段,就三百字了,太长了是不是不好啊? 还有小女打字挺慢的,所以各位大神有木有简练而出彩的综合写作模板呢?有些贪婪,麻烦了!
这是TPO1的综合写作,第一次练手,望指教!! 对lecture的时态有些纠结~
The reading passage explores the issue of a four-day week can make contribution to the company, the coutry and employees as well.The professor’s lecture deals with the same issue. However, he thinks that the choice of working only four days in a week does not have such good outcome, which contradicts what the reading states. And in the lecture, he uses three specific points to support his idea. First, even though the reading passage suggests that the company can reduce the frquency of making mistakes, although paying the same amount of salaies to workers, the professor argues in the lecture that the company cannot make profits by doing this. This is because adding new jobs means spending more money on training and medical assurances for the new employees. Also, the company's profit is cut down due to the more office spaces and computers. Obviously, the professor’s argument disproves its counterpart in the reading.
Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that the unemployee rate will desearce in the whole country, the professor contends that the situation of unemployment will not be relieved. Then he supports this point with the fact that owing to costly cost, the company will force the employees to undertake a five- day work in only four days. In other words, no job will be created to the country, instead, the employees will get more pressure than they used to be. Finally, the professor asserts that the employees will reduce their jobs' stability and harm their chances for advancing their careers, whereas the author of the reading claims that it will give employees more time to stay with their families and friends. The professor proves that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that company prefer the worker working five days per week, beacuse they devote themselves to the company. |
|