ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5173|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论][原创]og208

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-10-20 07:42:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论][原创]og208

208中涉及的such as与 like的区分似乎很微妙, 有谁能详细解释一下吗


不胜感谢

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-20 08:00:00 | 只看该作者

不好意思,现在把题加上


208. Teratomas are unusual forms of cancer because they are composed of tissues such as tooth and bone not normally found in the organ in which the tumor appears.


(A)  because they are composed of tissues such as tooth and bone


(B)  because they are composed of tissues like tooth and bone that are


(C)  because they are composed of tissues, like tooth and bone, tissues


(D)  in that their composition, tissues such as tooth and bone, is


(E)   in that they are composed of tissues such as tooth and bone, tissues


Only E, the best choice, clearly states that teratomas consist of tissues such as tooth and bone, and that such tissues are not normally found in the organ with the teratoma. Clear statement of this fact requires the repetition of tissues to establish the appositive--tissues normally found.... Without such repetition, A and B imprecisely state that the tooth and bone, as opposed to the tissues, are not normally found in the affected organ. Choices B and C alter the meaning with the use of like', that is, they suggest that the tissues are not tooth and bone, but only like them. The confused syntax of D states that their composition, not the tissues, is found in the organ....


这个句子里, likesuch as不是都有"象....."的意思吗

板凳
发表于 2004-10-20 08:04:00 | 只看该作者
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-21 13:53:00 | 只看该作者

感谢版主, 我终于明白了

5#
发表于 2007-7-23 23:32:00 | 只看该作者
A为什么不对,not normally found ...分词从句做定语做修饰 tooth and bone?
6#
发表于 2007-11-26 19:52:00 | 只看该作者

自己顶一下

7#
发表于 2007-11-27 14:49:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ustchero在2007-7-23 23:32:00的发言:
A为什么不对,not normally found ...分词从句做定语做修饰 tooth and bone?

OG说的很清楚:

A and B imprecisely state that the tooth and bone, as opposed to the tissues,
            are not normally found in the affected organ.

8#
发表于 2007-12-29 12:03:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用vanissa在2007-11-27 14:49:00的发言:

OG说的很清楚:

A and B imprecisely state that the tooth and bone, as opposed to the tissues,
   are not normally found in the affected organ.

Is there anybody who is albe to explain the statement above in detail?
What does it really mean?
9#
发表于 2008-4-7 21:18:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得og是说that修饰tooth和bone了,不再修饰tissues.所以后面同位语要补出主语,以表清晰。但是那句as opposed to the tissues,我也不太明白,是说这样就使得tissues变成可以找到的了么?

10#
发表于 2008-4-17 08:19:00 | 只看该作者
敝人真是有点愚钝。看了所有的帖子,大家说的原理我都明白了。可是因为这个句子我就不理解,搞不清这几个术语之间的关系,所以我在我不清楚句意的情况下,我怎么确认”not normally found..."这句就不能修饰“tooth and bone"么?除非说”not normally found..."修饰对象不明确所以错。有可能:1)修饰“tooth and bone";2)修饰”bone";3)修饰“tissues”。
还请NN指教!!:)
以下是引用goyce36在2008-4-7 21:18:00的发言:

我觉得og是说that修饰tooth和bone了,不再修饰tissues.所以后面同位语要补出主语,以表清晰。但是那句as opposed to the tissues,我也不太明白,是说这样就使得tissues变成可以找到的了么?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-17 15:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部