ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1402|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

BW Ranking 2004

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-10-8 11:31:00 | 只看该作者

BW Ranking 2004



2004 RANK



SCHOOL



2002 RANK



CORP. POLL



GRAD. POLL



INTELLECT. CAPITAL



ANNUAL TUITION*



APPLICANTS ACCEPTED



ENROLLMENT***



MEDIAN PAY ($ 000s)



GRADS w/OFFER BY GRAD.



AVG. WORK EXP. (Months)



RECRUITER GRADES



MBA GRADES















1























Grads commend Kellogg's teamwork-oriented culture. Recruiters say the innovative curriculum produces the best marketing and general management grads.




2























Ranks tops with recruiters for analytical skills and finance. Student raves across the board--from curriculum to career services--keep Chicago near the top.




3























Revamped career services and increased global presence gains school nine spots in grad poll. The perennial powerhouse still ranks tops with recruiters in all areas.




4























Grads maintain tech-savvy, entrepreneurial reputation with recruiters. Students deem their peers and the overall program top-notch.




5























Students still appreciate the high-powered network of alums but downgrade an unresponsive administration. Recruiters still give high marks overall.




6























Gets the most-improved award from recruiters who applaud grads' general management and operations skills. Students rate it tops in leadership training.




7























Sees a five-point jump in the corporate poll this year as recruiters take note of new curriculum. Grads compliment career services efforts and give high marks all around.




8























Recruiters look to Columbia for finance whizzes with a global perspective. Students like the diverse community but complain about teaching quality and cramped facilities.




9























Recruiters knocked MIT down three spots to No.9, but grads' support of the cutting-edge curriculum and faculty is unflinching, and faculty research is top-rate.




10























Grads enjoy close relationships with faculty and a close-knit campus community. Steadfast recruiters rely on Tuck's top-notch general management program.




11
























Strong emphasis on leadership and teamwork rates high with students, but both grads and recruiters would like to see more global reach.





12
























Students give high praise to Darden's faculty but long for a more diverse campus. Grads' teamwork and business ethics keep recruiters coming back.





13
























Jumps two spots as grads credit improved teaching quality and a helpful career services office. Financial recruiting base remains solid.





14
























Gets high marks for faculty research, but students rate profs low on the availability scale. Recruiters still come for general management experts.





15
























Again takes No.1 grade with students for focus on technology and e-business but fails to place above average in other categories. Feeling among recruiters is mutual.





16
























Although students say the administration is responsive, they want better teaching in core courses. Reputation in corporate world grows with a new dean.





17
























Haas loses favor with grads and recruiters, bringing it down four spots. Students say faculty are less accessible but still rate the entrepreneurship program among the best.





18
























Overall grad and corporate rankings inch upward. Core faculty earn an A+ from Kelley grads in a year when most MBAs grumble about poor teaching quality.





19
























Dropped by a handful of recruiters since 2002. Grads express confidence in starting their own businesses with skills learned at McCombs.





20
























Faculty research on the rise as Goizueta jumps up seven spots in intellectual capital. New leadership initiative inspires students.





21
























As technology comes back into favor, recruiters remember an old favorite. Students appreciate the high-tech learning environment but lament the weak alumni network.





22
























Snubbed by some recruiters who give grads low marks on analysis and teamwork. In need of technological improvements; student satisfaction falls 13 points.





23
























Faculty recruiting efforts pay off as school gains ground in student poll. Grads laud the placement office's ability to connect them with nontraditional recruiters.





24
























Still a reliable source for recruiters looking for solid business ethics, but grads say career services lacks the networking ability of a top school.





25
























Maintains positive international reputation with recruiters. Enjoys a jump in the student poll because of steady improvements in teaching and job placement.





26
























A recent shift to teaching entrepreneurship within corporations woos big-name recruiters. Grads praise the curriculum despite lackluster career services.





27
























Suffers a 15-point drop in corporate poll. Received average ratings from grads in all areas but alumni connections, where network is as strong as ever.





28
























Building a tech-savvy reputation with recruiters. Grads find it tough to get face time with research-oriented professors. Alumni network needs strengthening.





29
























Major recruiters dropped Simon from their short lists of campus visits since 2002. International students continue complaints about career placement.





30
























Owen grads have yet to see the desired curriculum enhancements and diversity on campus. Recruiters still unsatisfied but notice some improvement.


Just got from the school - Hope it helps: some of the ranking does not make a lot sense though


The overall ranking is based on MBA graduate rankings (45 percent), corporate recruiter rankings (45 percent), and intellectual capital (10 percent) rankings.


Here is the whole table:







WOMEN


INTL.


MINORITIES


PRE-MBA


POST-MBA


COMMUNI- CATION


TEAM- WORK


ANALYTIC SKILLS


TEACHING QUALITY


CAREER SERVICES


Northwestern (Kellogg)


1


3


2


20


$36,370


23%


30%


31%


14%


$70.0


$125.0


85%


62


A


A


A


A


A


Chicago


2


1


5


14


34,400


NR


30


29


7


67.0


127.0


82


53


A


B


A


A


A


Pennsylvania (Wharton)


5


5


3


6


35,203


16


34


33


11


75.0


144.0


86


72


A


A


A


B


A


Stanford


4


7


1


3


37,998


10


36


32


10


75.0


150.0


81


48


A


A


A


A


A


Harvard


3


2


11


7


39,100


13


35


33


12


85.0


147.5


94


53


A


A


A


A


A


Michigan (Ross)


8


4


9


15


32,688


35


26


29


8


62.0


115.0


85


62


A


A


A


B


A


Cornell (Johnson)


11


8


8


5


35,660


36


27


28


10


60.0


115.0


71


60


A


A


A


A


A


Columbia


7


6


15


4


36,295


15


33


28


11


75.0


142.5


87


59


A


A


A


C


A


MIT (Sloan)


6


14


4


2


37,050


20


25


35


9


68.0


128.0


91


64


B


C


A


A


B


Dartmouth (Tuck)


10


11


6


9


38,857


25


30


29


4


70.0


135.0


88


61


A


A


B


A


A


Duke (Fuqua)


9


12


12


10


36,399


37


33


33


13


63.0


118.0


79


68


A


A


A


B


B




Virginia (Darden)


12


13


7


34


35,200


38


27


26


9


62.0


120.0


69


60


A


A


B


A


B




NYU (Stern)


15


10


14


25


35,760


22


38


31


14


65.0


130.0


80


59


B


B


A


A


A




UCLA (Anderson)


16


21


10


1


26,691


25


30


24


8


75.0


127.0


78


56


C


B


B


B


A




Carnegie Mellon (Tepper)


19


15


19


11


37,000


28


23


30


6


64.0


110.0


77


52


C


B


A


A


B




UNC (Kenan Flagler)


18


17


17


8


33,500


47


29


27


12


60.0


110.0


68


63


B


A


B


B


B




UC Berkeley (Haas)


13


19


13


23


33,758


17


27


34


5


80.0


131.0


78


67


B


B


B


B


B




Indiana (Kelley)


20


18


18


43


24,201


33


26


30


9


52.0


103.0


67


59


A


B


B


A


B




Texas (McCombs)


21


23


22


26


30,116


43


25


24


8


55.0


110.0


65


61


A


A


B


B


B




Emory (Goizueta)


22


27


20


12


32,468


37


23


30


9


55.0


107.0


74


58


B


B


B


B


A




Purdue (Krannert)


26


20


28


17


26,988


44


19


35


6


45.0


101.0


74


55


C


B


B


C


B




Yale


14


28


21


17


37,359


25


32


29


9


57.0


118.0


72


48


B


C


C


B


B




Washington U. (Olin)


24


38


16


16


34,285


54


23


35


10


50.0


110.0


64


56


C


C


C


A


A




Notre Dame (Mendoza)


29


9


35


33


30,530


49


23


28


17


51.0


102.5


63


52


B


B


B


C


C




Georgetown (McDonough)


30


24


26


38


32,976


41


32


37


10


55.0


115.0


75


61


C


B


C


B


A




Babson (Olin)


NA


16


32


44


29,900


59


27


30


7


62.0


97.5


52


72


B


NA


B


B


D




USC (Marshall)


17


29


23


40


34,692


36


31


22


9


60.0


100.0


55


66


B


B


B


C


B




Maryland (Smith)


25


37


24


21


30,216


38


34


34


11


45.0


105.0


65


63


C


D


C


B


B




Rochester (Simon)


27


39


25


18


34,767


37


23


42


17


50.0


105.0


71


55


C


B


C


A


B




Vanderbilt (Owen)


28


36


27


21


32,790


68


25


24


4


55.0


102.0


66


61


B


B


B


C


B













1. Northwestern (Kellogg)


2. Chicago


3. U Penn (Wharton)


4. Stanford


5. HBS


6. Michigan (Ross)


7. Cornell (Johnson)


8. Columbia


9. MIT (Sloan)


10. Dartmouth (Tuck)


11. Duke (Fugua)


12. Virginia (Darden)





Zhiyong Daniel Ren


MBA 2006 | S. C. Johnson Graduate School of Management | Cornell University


email:  zr29@cornell.edu

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-8 11:32:00 | 只看该作者

Sorry it messes up the format, I will try it again

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-8 11:37:00 | 只看该作者

2004 RANK

SCHOOL

2002 RANK

CORP. POLL

GRAD. POLL

INTELLECT. CAPITAL

ANNUAL TUITION*

APPLICANTS ACCEPTED

ENROLLMENT***

MEDIAN PAY ($ 000s)

GRADS w/OFFER BY GRAD.

AVG. WORK EXP. (Months)

RECRUITER GRADES

MBA GRADES

WOMEN

INTL.

MINORITIES

PRE-MBA

POST-MBA

COMMUNI- CATION

TEAM- WORK

ANALYTIC SKILLS

TEACHING QUALITY

CAREER SERVICES

1

Northwestern (Kellogg)

1

3

2

20

$36,370

23%

30%

31%

14%

$70.0

$125.0

85%

62

A

A

A

A

A

Grads commend Kellogg's teamwork-oriented culture. Recruiters say the innovative curriculum produces the best marketing and general management grads.

2

Chicago

2

1

5

14

34,400

NR

30

29

7

67.0

127.0

82

53

A

B

A

A

A

Ranks tops with recruiters for analytical skills and finance. Student raves across the board--from curriculum to career services--keep Chicago near the top.

3

Pennsylvania (Wharton)

5

5

3

6

35,203

16

34

33

11

75.0

144.0

86

72

A

A

A

B

A

Revamped career services and increased global presence gains school nine spots in grad poll. The perennial powerhouse still ranks tops with recruiters in all areas.

4

Stanford

4

7

1

3

37,998

10

36

32

10

75.0

150.0

81

48

A

A

A

A

A

Grads maintain tech-savvy, entrepreneurial reputation with recruiters. Students deem their peers and the overall program top-notch.

5

Harvard

3

2

11

7

39,100

13

35

33

12

85.0

147.5

94

53

A

A

A

A

A

Students still appreciate the high-powered network of alums but downgrade an unresponsive administration. Recruiters still give high marks overall.

6

Michigan (Ross)

8

4

9

15

32,688

35

26

29

8

62.0

115.0

85

62

A

A

A

B

A

Gets the most-improved award from recruiters who applaud grads' general management and operations skills. Students rate it tops in leadership training.

7

Cornell (Johnson)

11

8

8

5

35,660

36

27

28

10

60.0

115.0

71

60

A

A

A

A

A

Sees a five-point jump in the corporate poll this year as recruiters take note of new curriculum. Grads compliment career services efforts and give high marks all around.

8

Columbia

7

6

15

4

36,295

15

33

28

11

75.0

142.5

87

59

A

A

A

C

A

Recruiters look to Columbia for finance whizzes with a global perspective. Students like the diverse community but complain about teaching quality and cramped facilities.

9

MIT (Sloan)

6

14

4

2

37,050

20

25

35

9

68.0

128.0

91

64

B

C

A

A

B

Recruiters knocked MIT down three spots to No.9, but grads' support of the cutting-edge curriculum and faculty is unflinching, and faculty research is top-rate.

10

Dartmouth (Tuck)

10

11

6

9

38,857

25

30

29

4

70.0

135.0

88

61

A

A

B

A

A

返回列表 发新帖
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 商学院申请

NTU MBA

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-6 22:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部