LSAT－7－1－6

6.(A)     Advertisement: Anyone who exercises knows from firsthand experience that exercise leads to better performance of such physical organs as the heart and lungs, as well as to improvement in muscle tone. And since your brain is a physical organ, your actions can improve its performance, too. Act now. Subscribe to Stimulus: read the magazine that exercises your brain.

The Advertisement employs which one of the following argumentative strategies?

(A) It cites experimental evidence that subscribing to the product being advertised has desirable consequences.

(B) It ridicules people who do not subscribe to Stimulus by suggesting that they do not believe that exercise will improve brain capacity.

(C) It explains the process by which the product being advertised brings about the result claimed for its use.

(D) It supports its recommendation by a careful analysis of the concept of exercise.（E）

(E) It implies that brains and muscle are similar in one respect because they are similar in another respect

Why A can’t explain the argumentative strategies? “from firsthand experience” indicates “it cites experimental evidence”

“Subscribe to Stimulus: read the magazine that exercises your brain.” Can demonstrate  “subscribing to the product being advertised has desirable consequences.”

What’s wrong with A?

I see. I misunderstood "firsthand experience" as "experimental evidence"

一个是经验，一个是实验，

经常这样不仔细，快被自己气死了！

请问C为啥不对？(C) It explains the process by which the product being advertised brings about the result claimed for its use.

C的意思是这样吗？ 解释为什么广告的产品能有所说的效果。

1."improve performance"也许不能概括成"the process "  

2.并没有直接解释 the product 的 process.

3.本段的主要论证策略是通过类比,从一个事物的好处推另一个事物的好处.