LSAT-23-4-5 好多个that....

5.     Attorneys for a criminal defendant charged that the government, in a cover-up, had destroyed evidence that government replied that there is no evidence that would even tend to support the defendant in the case.

Which one of the following is the most accurate evaluation of the government’s reply?

(A) It leaves open the question of whether the government had destroyed such evidence.

(B) It establishes that the attorneys’ charge is an exaggeration.

(C) It shows that the attorneys did not know whether their charge was true.

(D) It demonstrates the government’s failure to search for evidence in its files.（A）

(E) If true, it effectively disproves the charge made on behalf of the defendant.

看不太懂  没有思路   有人可以讲解一下吗

感谢!!

原文（你漏了不少）：Attorneys for a criminal defendant charged that the government, in a cover-up, had destroyed evidence that would have supported the defendant in a case. The government replied that there is no evidence that would even tend to support the defendant in the case.

1。这种题和通常意义上的EVALUATION不同，它要你对政府的回答作出评价。实际上是考你对政府的回答的理解。

2。原文说被告律师声称政府秘密销毁有利于被告的证据，政府回答说没有证据支持被告。政府的回答有两种含义：一是律师的声明没有证据；二是证据被销毁了，就再也没证据支持被告了。所以实际没明确回答律师的声明，即A

thanks , lawyer !!

我的题目是从置顶的 [下载]目前最全的GMAT逻辑复习材料

下载的   需要通知相关人员做更改吗?