- UID
- 674544
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-9-22
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
大家好，我是刚考完G的托福新手。3.18的。第一篇综合写作，求指教。我有两个问题：
（1）我理解的综合写作是转述lectrue的观点和speaker的观点，同时指出它们的关系，这对吧？
（2）综合写作大家一般写多少字啊？感觉这个写不长啊，我现在就300左右、、、、
谢谢！！！
In this lecture, the professor apparently refutes the point in the passage. According to the professor, the painting was actually a piece of work by Rembrandt.
To begin with, the first point by the professor is that the fur collar was not the fault of the original painter and that it was added to the original painting a long time after the painting was made. This obviously contradicts the statement in the passage that the collar and the cap were inconsistent.
What is more, the second piece of evidence that the speaker used to cast doubt on the reading material is that the after removing the level added to the painting, the original light color collar reflects light on the woman's face. It undermines the statement in the passage that a part of the woman's face should be in shadow with the dark fur collar.
Last but not least, the speaker states that the painting was made of one piece of wood and other pieces of wood were added to the sides and the top of the original painting after it was accomplished. However, the passage says that the painting was painted on a panel made of several pieces of woods and that it was so different from the Rembrandt's habit to use panels of just one piece of wood. In the aspect, what the speaker says contradicts the statement in the passage.
To sum up, the passage indicates that this artist didn't paint this work. However, the speaker holds a opposite point of view that the painting was made by Rembrandt. |
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2012-3-1 22:43:10
收藏
收藏
楼主
